matic22
Ancient Mariner
With a massive € symbol backdrop.That would be pretty ironic for Bruxit. A tour consisting only of EU countries!
With a massive € symbol backdrop.That would be pretty ironic for Bruxit. A tour consisting only of EU countries!
I think you're right. I really thought (hoped) they would ''hurry'' with the next album this time.I honestly think that video was referring to fans from Australia, NZ and Japan constantly asking when they will be back since the cancelled shows, they certainly made a lot of fans happy yesterday
Maybe too fast for him? Some songs are not easy to sing.“We still play everything too fast”
I think it will be with Maiden, or both. Greece! Or they would save another European leg for 2025. Bruce should release the dates first.Also, maybe that's what Bruce meant when he said on couple of this years shows see you soon/next time. He meant he is gonna see fans soon/2024, not Maiden.
I think UK arena tour is possible in november 2024.That would be pretty ironic for Bruxit. A tour consisting only of EU countries!
I think UK arena tour is possible in november 2024.
He should open his gig with the chorus!Bruce as a solo artist headlining arenas in the UK? Not even in his wildest dreams!
That's not entirely correct. The A Matter Of The Beast Tour 2007 was due to TNOTB's 25th anniversary.Where does this 50th anniversary bullshit come from? I know it's fan fiction but FFS I don't think I ever saw Iron Maiden and Anniversary in the same sentence, surely the band didn't give a fuck about it. Even their history tours weren't based on any particular years. And 50 anniversary of what? Steve having a weird Christmas evening?
That's not entirely correct. The A Matter Of The Beast Tour 2007 was due to TNOTB's 25th anniversary.
Maiden should tune down half a step.IRON MAIDEN's BRUCE DICKINSON: We Don't Downtune Or Use Backing Tracks
In a new interview with Dave Gleeson of Australia's Triple M radio station, IRON MAIDEN singer Bruce Dickinson was asked how he and his bandmates have been able to incorporate a lot of new material into their setlist, seemingly without much pushback from their fans. He responded (as transcribed...blabbermouth.net
I think many of the singers who do tune down, can still do the songs in the original tunings, despite having deeper voices at this point. But tuning down enables them to be more consistent quality wise while also being able to sing 5 nights a week. I think Maiden should have tuned down at least 10 years ago - not because they don't sound good enough in standard tuning (they certainly do), but because Bruce would sound even better tuned down half a step. I think the pride he and Sebastian Bach places in singing in the original keys is misplaced. You're older, your voices are naturally lower, so tune down to avoid having to stretch, wear out or strain.I do think he'll regret these comments teleprompters and downtuning when his age truly catches up with him
There is one song where Maiden have tuned down a whole step in the studio...It feels like the tuning down discussion pops up once a year or so, though this time fueled by Bruce himself. I've said many times before that I believe Maiden should've started down tuning, or transposing some of their songs since the TFF days, but they are far too stubborn to do that. I don't think it's a constructive discussion, since nothing is going to be done about it anyways.
What I will always make sure to mention though, is that Maiden have transitioned a song a full step down before: Lord Of The Flies during the Death On The Road Tour. Ironically enough the reason wasn't for Bruce to have an easier time with the song; it was so that he can do the octave jump during the chorus and sing it even higher than the original lol
But yeah, for all purists (including Bruce apparantely) Maiden have done so before.
There is one song where Maiden have tuned down a whole step in the studio...
Let's see who guesses it first...
Does that really count? It was blatantly an excuse to walk back playing all of AMOLAD since the dates they were doing were nearly all stadiums and festivals where that would've gone down incredibly poorly, not to mention needing something more exciting for casual fans to sell tickets. The first few dates they did had all of three NOTB songs on them (specifically the usual suspects) and even the big festival appearances only had CotD added. Not really much of a 25th anniversary celebration to me.That's not entirely correct. The A Matter Of The Beast Tour 2007 was due to TNOTB's 25th anniversary.
Maiden, not Bruce.Bruce as a solo artist headlining arenas in the UK? Not even in his wildest dreams!
Ding ding ding. Apparently, Bruce couldn't sing it in e.You tell me what is certain but I'll tell you what is true...
Mother of Mercy it is.
I am 100% sure there will be some European dates next year but only a brief run in the second half of August.Lots of members are sure that Maiden gonna play in Europe next summer.
So with that, what do you think what is more logical/profitable course of action for Maiden HQ. To announce Maiden European dates first and then after some time Bruce's European tour dates or the other way round. Bruce first and then Maiden.
I think announcing Bruce's dates first might be better for Bruce's tour ticket sales.
Also, maybe that's what Bruce meant when he said on couple of this years shows see you soon/next time. He meant he is gonna see fans soon/2024, not Maiden.
Does that really count? It was blatantly an excuse to walk back playing all of AMOLAD since the dates they were doing were nearly all stadiums and festivals where that would've gone down incredibly poorly, not to mention needing something more exciting for casual fans to sell tickets. The first few dates they did had all of three NOTB songs on them (specifically the usual suspects) and even the big festival appearances only had CotD added. Not really much of a 25th anniversary celebration to me.
Maiden, not Bruce.
They didn't need to do that. They just had to play a mix of their classics plus 5 AMOLAD songs, like on a normal new album tour. TNOTB is a special album for the band and it's no surprise that its anniversary was noted with something.Does that really count? It was blatantly an excuse to walk back playing all of AMOLAD since the dates they were doing were nearly all stadiums and festivals where that would've gone down incredibly poorly, not to mention needing something more exciting for casual fans to sell tickets. The first few dates they did had all of three NOTB songs on them (specifically the usual suspects) and even the big festival appearances only had CotD added. Not really much of a 25th anniversary celebration to me.
I have a pretty easy and good tour idea - new album tour!There isn't any sort of pressure like that for 2025, hell, if for whatever reason they have no good tour ideas they can just extend TFP out by swapping a few songs and throwing in a new one.
I doubt it. The dates would be a bit ''too much'' for their usual tour dates for one year these days.Maiden, not Bruce.