I love how Dave's solo flows into the song after the riff and think that's a great athmospheric moment live.
I agree. Great solo.
Honestly I think it centers around Alexander the Great. They'd said for years that they'd play it one day, and I think with their age at this point they thought "might as well do it now." And since just playing Alex on the Senjutsu tour by itself would seem not particularly thematic, why not make a hybrid tour of the two albums?
Granted, since "Senjutsu" is a title and album all about war in various ways, Alexander the Great would make a bit of sense just on its own. But I think it would still seem strange.
Yes. Alexander and Stranger, I'd say. I don't think Alexander wouldn't be thematic for the tour (I mean Senjutsu tour, with the SIT theme,
nope, but it's from that album). It would have been thematic for TBOS tour. But with such a popular song, I don't think they ''care'' about that. The ultimate deep cut!
I think it comes down to the stage show. They mention in the original press release that they regret not having the stage on video and want to correct that. It’s not the first time the band has said something to that effect so I see no reason to doubt that that is the main driving force. Because of that, I feel there really aren’t any guarantees with song selection.
This is probably the main reason. And they wanted a theme for another History/Hits tour, I guess. This is the last 80’s album they haven't focused on.
Possibly because most songs -though pleasant on the record- don't come across very well live, except "Wasted Years" and "Heaven Can Wait". And that is a major factor for Maiden when it comes to choosing the setlist.
I agree. It's a specific album. Sea, Runner, Stranger - they even didn't like how the title track sounded live or something, I forgot. Ironically, the 2 never played live songs from the album would be very good live songs.
What has me curious is whether they're really going to attempt the harder songs on SIT. Especially the psuedo-title-track. I'm sure they wouldn't play that song if they weren't certain they could do it justice. But can Maiden at this age really do it justice? Or, will they instead pick the "easier" to play songs from SIT like Wasted Years, Strange in a Strange Land, and Alexander?
Ultimately, I'm all kinds of curious what they'll choose. Vocally, I think Bruce can do just fine. It's Nicko's feet I'm most worried about, as selfish and nitpicky as that sounds.
Well, Wasted Years, Stranger and even Alexander are expected. I think they'll want to play the title track, but it should be the opening song. But as you said, they wouldn't play the song if they weren't certain they could do it justice. Aces High last year was slower because it was the last song in the set, while Hallowed isn't super fast in the studio verson, just to give some examples. SIT is one of Nicko's best works with Maiden and it would be difficult for him at the age of 70. They waited too long with the SIT album. Agree about Bruce.
No but now, communication in general and Internet fandom in particular create an expectation that was not there back when the album was originally released. If the old songs don't work as well as expected, they'll just use new backdrops and/or accessories (i.e the flamethrower and the cross, respectively on "Flight of Icarus" and "Sign of the Cross"). Maiden -and other bands their size- don't have to promote music any more but merely develop a brand.
You're right about the Internet fandom. Are you saying that Flight Of Icarus and Sign Of The Cross didn't work live last year? Stage props can't save a song live imo. They don't have to promote music anymore, but they always will.
Adrian has a great singing voice, but I’ve never found him and Bruce particularly able to harmonize well. Except in studio. And then Steve in the mix is just the worst. Run to the Hills I can tolerate because the chorus sounds fine with just one voice.
I wouldn't say that about Adrian and Bruce. As for Steve's backing vocals, well, during Paschendale in 2003 they sounded good. Agree about Run To The Hills.
How did he manage to convince Steve to bring back SIT. I'm sure it was not Steve's idea.
This tour is a real surprise, but (iirc) Steve said that SIT is an album without fillers. He even regrets not filming the 1986 tour. They know that it's one of their best and most liked albums. The case with Flight Of Icarus was more or less the same.
This is the last 80’s album they have not focused on, so it goes down to one last effort to squeeze out some "fresh" nostalgia, because tickets to these shows sells a lot easier than regular tours. So I think Steve and Rod have been counting money during the pandemic, and have pulled this hybrid tour as a last resort to get a quick fix.
^ This too.