Suppose a case where there's absolutely no doubt someone did what I described above, would you still be against eliminating them just because killing is wrong?
Hey, everyone's got their faults
I would hug you if you didn’t love Virtual XI so much!
Hey, everyone's got their faults![]()
Man, it hasn't even been a week. This obviously won't pass, butthe optics aloneTrump and his lackeys are disgusting.
My theory is that Trump got the Russians or some other bad actor to obtain blackmail material on most of the GOP (internet history, secret recordings, etc). I can’t think of another reason for the cult-like worship of him.
Aw, c'mon. It's not thaaat bad.Loving Virtual XI is far too extreme. Terrorism territory![]()
He isn't a single one of these things. Even the thing he cares most about, business, he pretty much sucks at. Trump is much less a business man and much more a con man. He makes his living by cheating taxes, not paying his employees, and probably laundering money for foreign billionaires.Resilience, accessibility, true to his word, funny, speaks out his mind, patriot, successful outside politics, not PC, populist, showmanship and more.
The fact alone that after he was just shot on the face and he raised up his fist, would be enough. McDonald man, Garbage man. Who else would be doing that and be convincing? Clinton did it with saxophone 30 years ago and he also won. But he didn’t age well, literally. We’ll see about Trump, he is one in 100 years case, but also perpetual work in progress, I am not holding my breath.
Resilience, accessibility, true to his word, funny, speaks out his mind, patriot, successful outside politics, not PC, populist, showmanship and more.
The fact alone that after he was just shot on the face and he raised up his fist, would be enough. McDonald man, Garbage man. Who else would be doing that and be convincing? Clinton did it with saxophone 30 years ago and he also won. But he didn’t age well, literally. We’ll see about Trump, he is one in 100 years case, but also perpetual work in progress, I am not holding my breath.
In 5's case, prominent propaganda network = state media run by country that sees opportunity in having an inept dumbass lead the USA.I would say a failing education system and 30+ years of influence from a prominent propaganda network would be a start.
In 5's case, prominent propaganda network = state media run by country that sees opportunity in having an inept dumbass lead the USA.
He is incredibly charismatic. A bit like Boris Johnson. Both products of inherited wealth. I suppose they have lots of positivity because they don’t have to worry about their mortgage, bills, being a competent parent, having morals or the consequences of their leadership.But hey, it’s hopeless in US politics, no side will acknowledge anything good on the other side or something they did wrong. I watched serious people from GOP side deny that it was a Nazi salute the same way I watched Dem side denying the poor state of Biden’s mind.
One must be blind by now not to acknowledge that Trump is charismatic for good or bad. But charismatic nonetheless.
Aw, c'mon. It's not thaaat bad.
He isn't a single one of these things. Even the thing he cares most about, business, he pretty much sucks at. Trump is much less a business man and much more a con man. He makes his living by cheating taxes, not paying his employees, and probably laundering money for foreign billionaires.
He would actually be richer if never went into business and just invested his inheritance. All this bullshit from his voter base about how he's "a great business man" couldn't be further from the truth. Anyone can be rich if their dad leaves them half a billion dollars. He's nothing but a conman and his voter base are dupes. The rest of us are victims of ignorance.![]()
It’s Official: Trump Would Be Richer If He Had Just Invested His Inheritance Into The S&P 500
Trump’s fortune plunged at the outset of the pandemic, but unlike the overall stock market, his real estate empire hasn’t come roaring back.www.forbes.com
He is incredibly charismatic. A bit like Boris Johnson. Both products of inherited wealth. I suppose they have lots of positivity because they don’t have to worry about their mortgage and bills…
Well there's a ringing endorsement.I’ve read ex first lady Nixon had seen the potential of Trump running for president since late 80s. There a letter from Richard Nixon documenting that.
Your views are your own business entirely. The way you've chosen to present them here isn't. You keep talking of tolerance but I fail to see much of it in your posts. You generate unpleasant levels of tension with them, and your language and attitude - and seem to be proud of it. "Forum members will ensure they post in a respectful fashion towards their fellow members" - that's from the forum rules in case you wonder - have you ever read it? You don't argue, you preach. You don't converse with people, you lecture them. And I don't think you're doing your cause much of a favour for that matter, just like vandalizing paintings doesn't really help alerting people to environmental problems.Which parts of the "agenda" I'm pushing do you think goes too far and would deserve a warning or banning? I'm not talking about the way I'm interacting with others and my aggressive and hostile tone at times
One must be blind by now not to acknowledge that Trump is charismatic for good or bad. But charismatic nonetheless.