Jer
'Til Tomorrow
Not with non-Republican voters.He might end up stronger.
Not with non-Republican voters.He might end up stronger.
This is the key point here. Convictions don’t buy Trump any extra non-Republican votes, and those are the exact votes he would need to win in 2024. Other side effects are debatable, but this outcome absolutely does not grow his voter base.I'm not sure it's going to motivate people who weren't already voting for Trump to support him.
Remember, uncommitted/independent voters fled from Hillary Clinton at the 11th hour at the mere idea that she was going to be charged with a crime. Trump's base is going to vote for him no matter what. Biden does have issues with energizing/motivating his base, but the uncommitted folks? Good luck trying to convince them to vote for the convicted felon.
Only ignorant people, morons, and Republican “true believers” are susceptible to believing this, sorry. If you think the president can unduly influence the activities of a state court, then you fundamentally don’t understand how the U.S. legal system works. Either educate yourself or face the slings and arrows you deserve for spreading uninformed bullshit like this.Here we have what many people consider weaponization of justice which can play in favor of Trump.
No one has made a credible “lawfare” argument yet. Dershowitz keeps saying it, but he has yet to back it up with any evidence or solid reasoning.Independent voters means they listen all voices and too many voices cry for lawfare.
You are wrong, and we already know it now.I may be wrong but we’ll know in a few months time.
You’re right. Clinton was not convicted of any crimes, Trump was.Apples and oranges.
No one has made a credible “lawfare” argument yet. Dershowitz keeps saying it, but he has yet to back it up with any evidence or solid reasoning.
You are wrong, and we already know it now.
Sedition and/or insurrection, but not treason, unless he was doing it on behalf of a foreign government.This is a man who already caused a straight up insurrection on live TV. If anyone else had pulled that shit they'd have been tried and convicted of treason.
A brand name isn’t an argument. Show me a credible argument made by him or anyone else that explains how Biden magically made the New York State legal system bend to his will, or accept the fact that you’re spreading false propaganda.Dershowitz is a very serious law professor and democrat, I guess he needs to educate himself too.
Point to anything suggesting that this helps him with people who aren’t already part of his base. I’ll wait.My argument was that Trump might end up stronger after this.
It’s not “smearing” when it’s true. You don’t have the first clue what you’re talking about here, you’ve been corrected on it multiple times, and yet in typical @____no5 fashion you keep repeating your misinformation anyway. Either do better, or stop pretending other people are in the wrong when they call you out on your obvious bullshit.No surprise you lost your temper again and carried away with your smearing.
This is a good correction, thank you! But it still makes my point stand. I feel had anyone else done this on live TV, there'd be much less delaying and much more convicting.Sedition and/or insurrection, but not treason, unless he was doing it on behalf of a foreign government.
And he is being tried for this, it’s just that the actual trial hasn’t started yet because of a combination of his lawyers’ delay tactics and the Supreme Court not acting faster. (And if he wins the election, he might be able to make the federal charges go away.)
Apples and oranges. Here we have what many people consider weaponization of justice which can play in favor of Trump. Independent voters means they listen all voices and too many voices cry for lawfare.
For Hillary it was one more evidence she might be evil after all, which is pretty believable and confirmed voters’ worst fears.
I may be wrong but we’ll know in a few months time.
Only ignorant people, morons, and Republican “true believers” are susceptible to believing this, sorry. If you think the president can unduly influence the activities of a state court, then you fundamentally don’t understand how the U.S. legal system works. Either educate yourself or face the slings and arrows you deserve for spreading uninformed bullshit like this.
No one has made a credible “lawfare” argument yet. Dershowitz keeps saying it, but he has yet to back it up with any evidence or solid reasoning.
You are wrong, and we already know it now.
Dershowitz is a very serious law professor and democrat, I guess he needs to educate himself too.
Let's wait until November. My argument was that Trump might end up stronger after this. No surprise you lost your temper again and carried away with your smearing.
A brand name isn’t an argument. Show me a credible argument made by him or anyone else that explains how Biden magically made the New York State legal system bend to his will, or accept the fact that you’re spreading false propaganda.
Point to anything suggesting that this helps him with people who aren’t already part of his base. I’ll wait.
It’s not “smearing” when it’s true. You don’t have the first clue what you’re talking about here, you’ve been corrected on it multiple times, and yet in typical @____no5 fashion you keep repeating your misinformation anyway. Either do better, or stop pretending other people are in the wrong when they call you out on your obvious bullshit.
Fair enough, but if we give up on resisting nonsense just because it becomes tiresome, then the nonsense wins.I think I'm starting to see what Nietzsche meant when he was talking about eternal recurrence.
Fair enough, but if we give up on resisting nonsense just because it becomes tiresome, then the nonsense wins.
Here we have what many people consider weaponization of justice which can play in favor of Trump. Independent voters means they listen all voices and too many voices cry for lawfare.
For Hillary it was one more evidence she might be evil after all, which is pretty believable and confirmed voters’ worst fears.