She thinks it's a big deal because the media is making a big deal about it. Which...they shouldn't be. It's not a big deal.She seems to think it is a big deal .. otherwise why trot out the Marion Berry defense
She thinks it's a big deal because the media is making a big deal about it. Which...they shouldn't be. It's not a big deal.She seems to think it is a big deal .. otherwise why trot out the Marion Berry defense
Politician essentially breaking the law (even a stupid law) ... will generally get attention. It is not like they would have opened up for Betty Smith, plain old citizen.She thinks it's a big deal because the media is making a big deal about it. Which...they shouldn't be. It's not a big deal.
The multitude of Hatch Act violations by the Trump administration would like to disagree with you.Politician essentially breaking the law (even a stupid law) ... will generally get attention.
The Hatch Act has been violated by pretty much everyone (at least in spirit) ... Trump is more blatant to be sureThe multitude of Hatch Act violations by the Trump administration would like to disagree with you.
Well one un-named source said it ... but if your point is Trump is a giant asshole and should not hold office .. no really argument there.Pentagon confirms that Trump called American soldiers who fell in WW1 "losers" and "suckers".
But Nancy Pelosi went to the hairdresser's, so I think they're even, Trump might even have some credit points.
How one is non-news (a haircut) and the other is insulting one of the most American things to be American (serving your country in the armed forces)Well one un-named source said it ... but if your point is Trump is a giant asshole and should not hold office .. no really argument there.
Struggling to see what one even has to do with another though
How one is non-news (a haircut) and the other is insulting one of the most American things to be American (serving your country in the armed forces)
This is not the only time Trump has said this and in this particular case it wasn't just one source.
Agreed, I think the point is the media reactions to both events are rather.... disproportionate, with one garnering WAY too much attention (a haircut) and the other isn't receiving enough. Honestly, like I told a friend of mine on another issue, I don't care WHO did what. What party the individual belongs to doesn't make the thing better or worse.Again, not sure what the point it ... Pelosi did what she did .. Trump most likely did what he did. If we want to go back and forth on someone from party A did something and dismiss it by something worse done b party B .. this will be a long thread .. and for the most part Trump will end up being the worst, but does not deflect from the fact that both parties are sketchy as fuck .. Trump brought it to a new level .. but again .. a lesser of two evils election, which I am honestly sick of
No, The Atlantic has four sources, and the WAPO dug up confirmation from a fifth.Well one un-named source said it
I stand corrected .. earlier stories about the story said 1No, The Atlantic has four sources, and the WAPO dug up confirmation from a fifth.
Anonymous sources are an industry standard, lest we forget, when dealing with people like this.