Host countries do not open embassies. That is the job of the country in question. Many countries that are recognized by Ireland, Norway, and Spain do not have embassies in those countries. Ireland, for example, recognizes 190+ countries but only has 67 embassies in Dublin. So no, it's not the next step.Next logical step for Ireland, Norway and Spain is to open Palestine Embassies in their capitals.
This is also untrue. The PLO runs the West Bank, and is far more likely to be the governmental-type agency that does business with any western governments for that region.And those Embassies will be run by hamas, because now there's no other government.
You've leapt to a massive conclusion that isn't supported by evidence. Recognizing the existence of the Palestinian state doesn't mean you like or even support their government. The USA recognizes the existence of Russia.Three European countries want to deal with hamas.
Well, Ireland and terrorists? Not exactly unheard of. As for rape and murder, all states commit murder, all armies commit rape. That's not to say that Hamas's violence on Oct 7 is acceptable, but it is fair to say that the violence committed by Israel in response is beyond acceptable proportions. Killing 35,000 to avenge 1200 is beyond the pale for most people.With terrorists and rapists and murderers.
The fact that you are basing "leftists" on your idea of what should happen rather than the actual stated policies and sling it seemingly as an insult speaks volumes as well.* I have no slightest idea who run respective countries. Their action speak volumes to me.
So... Next logical step for Ireland, Norway and Spain is to open Palestine Embassies in their capitals. And those Embassies will be run by hamas, because now there's no other government. Three European countries want to deal with hamas. With terrorists and rapists and murderers. Three Europe's governments have send signal that by beheading and burning innocent civilians you may achieve your goals! Idiots!
the timing of this action is god awful. Leftists* siding with terrorists.
( I despise Netanyahu. But I stand with Israel which wages it's war for survival. hamas is Irans tool. Europe wants to have a la iran/taliban country next to Israel?)
* I have no slightest idea who run respective countries. Their action speak volumes to me.
That's not to say that Hamas's violence on Oct 7 is acceptable, but it is fair to say that the violence committed by Israel in response is beyond acceptable proportions. Killing 35,000 to avenge 1200 is beyond the pale for most people.
well.
Yep, the hypocrisy from the U.S. on this is appalling, but sadly not unexpected. If we’re not going to recognize the authority of the ICC, then we should be consistent about that across the board and not use them as a convenient political prop when they happen to do things we like to other people.Last year Biden administration applauded ICC to issue warrant against Putin, now that it's about Netanyahu, it threatens sanctions!
In addition Khan of ICC was on record in Amanpour's CNN show that a senior leader angrily told him that "ICC is built for Africa and thugs like Putin"
This is arguably the most uninformed post I've ever seen on this board, and that includes those by the guy who claimed we're controlled by Alpha Draconians.
As long as hamas is in the big picture, recognizing Palestine is not a great move, imo.It is quite shocking, isn't it?
As long as hamas is in the big picture, recognizing Palestine is not a great move, imo.
I agree with that, but Palestine's recognition should be carried in a different manner. Now it looks like this. Hamas: We murdered/burned/raped/taken hostages of Israel citizens. Israel begins justified act of war to punish terrorists. Some European countries: we recognise Palestine. I see horrendous logical connection here. I understand that civilians are dying but who's using them as a shield? Yes, hamas. You cannot create a new country with old evil lurking in it. That's how I see it.Palestine should have been recognised decades ago. It is a fundamental part of trying to solve the conflict.
I agree with that, but Palestine's recognition should be carried in a different manner. Now it looks like this. Hamas: We murdered/burned/raped/taken hostages of Israel citizens. Israel begins justified act of war to punish terrorists. Some European countries: we recognise Palestine. I see horrendous logical connection here. I understand that civilians are dying but who's using them as a shield? Yes, hamas. You cannot create a new country with old evil lurking in it. That's how I see it.
Ok, then let's agree to disagree.It looks like that to you, not to many of us here.
I am afraid we will have to agree to disagree.
Though @GhostofCain is also right that this should have already happened long ago, likely as part of a peace agreement that was ultimately rejected by Arafat.