The Mid-Distance Runner
Educated Fool
"The Ides of March...Wrathchild" is a fabulous opener as a single song.
I know that type of mindset. It is called I-am-too-lazy-to-do-my-job-properly.
I know that type of mindset. It is called I-am-too-lazy-to-do-my-job-properly.
I know that type of mindset. It is called I-am-too-lazy-to-do-my-job-properly.
So Steve is lazy because he chose an unfinished cover that the creator wouldn't want his name associated with, for choosing a rough master that Shirley wasn't finished with, and not letting Adrian re-record his rough demo? Yeah, that sounds like it exactly. He's so lazy he don't want other people to do their job properly.
I know that type of mindset. It is called I-am-too-lazy-to-do-my-job-properly.
*sigh* I hate to admit it, but I kind of have to side with Gk1, at least to the extent that I can think of a few examples in the songwriting throughout the albums that have a bit of an unpolished feel to me. They are few and far between, but they are there.
Does this comment fill you guys with hope?A lot of the songs were actually written while we were there in the studio and we rehearsed and recorded them straight away while they were still fresh, and I think that immediacy really shows in the songs, they have almost a live feel to them, I think.
Well, Steve sounds like he's said, in interview, that BoS is even more live/rough (written & recorded really quickly, is that what he said?) sounding than anything they've done previously. I'm guessing the result might not be to everyone's liking...
Does this comment fill you guys with hope?
When you take out all the gorgeous guitar work in the middle (the stuff Bruce clearly didn't write, despite the credits), all the music which really makes it the tune it is (in my opinion), then not sloppy; just nothing special.How bad could a sloppy take of Powerslave be?!
I agree with what you say, Flash. I'm just saying, this sounds like a lot more of what a whole bunch of folks (you included) have just been talking (some complaining) about above:It depends on the material. AMOLAD was almost theatrical/film like in nature and the raw live feel was appropriate. TFF needed more polishing, a lot of it depended on atmosphere and layers and production plays a massive part in something like that. The exact same thing is the case with the The X Factor, another album that largely depended on atmosphere.
It is called I-am-too-lazy-to-do-my-job-properly.
...could have been really excellent were it not so unpolished.
This makes the albums have quite few parts done in a sloppy way and structures that are not that fitting.
...I can think of a few examples in the songwriting throughout the albums that have a bit of an unpolished feel to me.
Aye/naw?I agree that there was unpolishedness.
When you take out all the gorgeous guitar work in the middle (the stuff Bruce clearly didn't write, despite the credits), all the music which really makes it the tune it is (in my opinion), then not sloppy; just nothing special.
I agree with what you say, Flash. I'm just saying, this sounds like a lot more of what a whole bunch of folks (you included) have just been talking (some complaining) about above:
Agreed. But, is it a sound that people want to hear on an Iron Maiden studio album? I'm just curious, as there seems to be quite a difference of opinion about the production value of various albums.I didn't complain about unpolishedness in general. Sometimes unpolishedness makes the work even better. It's a crucial element of punk rock and punk influenced music, for example. Kill 'Em All, for instance, wouldn't be as good as it is if it were produced cleanly or was polished further. Unpolishedness made AMOLAD better, it made TFF worse. Here's hoping BoS is in the same vein as the former.