#CashGrab #SelloutIf the album comes out with the good news, or is announced with it, anticipation for it will go through the roof. It could finally be their #1 album in the US.
Now seriously, I agree with everything you said
#CashGrab #SelloutIf the album comes out with the good news, or is announced with it, anticipation for it will go through the roof. It could finally be their #1 album in the US.
I hope not since I want them to go even MORE progressive, but at the same time, I'm just going to be thankful for some new Maiden.Didn't Adrian state -some time ago- that they wanted to follow a "shorter songs" approach on this new album?
Didn't Adrian state -some time ago- that they wanted to follow a "shorter songs" approach on this new album?
That's not mutually exclusive to what LC said. A good manager is supposed to take advantage of every opportunity, and at the same time maintain integrity.
Why isn't it? That shit happens all the time in the real world. Sports venues sell out when famous stars are scheduled to return from injuries. Movie stars have "comebacks" from injury or disease or incarceration (that's to you, RDJ) that catapult both them and their vehicles to greater fame. Why can't Iron Maiden do that?But i was refering to what LC said only about the antecipation regarding not only a new album being out but also being released at the same time of the news of Bruce's recovery. Because if that is an opportunity to make money, i wonder if it's ethically acceptable. In my opinion, it isn't.
Correct. However, that was then. Now, Maiden are big enough. If people out here think they are not big enough, then OK, Rod's bag of tricks is still appreciated.Look, Maiden is great for two reasons, and one is because the music is awesome, but the other is because Rod managed them to the stars. Look at their early days - Rod made sure they had a multi-album deal before they made the first album, AND he got them to open for the biggest band in rock at the time, Kiss. He managed their US interactions brilliantly - everyone heard about Iron Maiden. Kids who wanted to piss off their parents bought The Number of the Beast en masse. This is because of Rod. If Maiden was a bad band, they'd never have lived up to it, but he put down the groundwork to make them get to each new height.
Yeah, good thing.However, if Bruce is never able to sing again, that could also sort of be a good thing as it could cause record sales to increase because people will know that there will never be another Maiden album again which could cause more people to go out and buy the new album.
What we think is irrelevant. What does the band think? And let's be honest - Rod Smallwood might be the business manager, but Steve Harris makes the final decisions. We all know this to be true. Maiden waiting to announce tourdates and album information for Bruce to be cancer-free makes sense on *every* level. I'm merely pointing out that Rod would certainly note that this includes the business level.Correct. However, that was then. Now, Maiden are big enough. If people out here think they are not big enough, then OK, Rod's bag of tricks is still appreciated.
I care more about the music than status. In the last five years, they could have been more creative and productive without Rod's restrictive scheduling.
We both know Travis meant "making the best out of a horrible situation".Yeah, good thing.
Doesn't a band or manager think about the public, the audience? Or about own creativity? We, discussing this, it certainly happens, so it is relevant out here isn't it? It might not have impact. Although, I do think the band is certainly busy with the hunger of the fans.What we think is irrelevant.
The best for people who make money out of it, but not necesserily for me ot other fans who are not busy with status.We both know Travis meant "making the best out of a horrible situation".
Of course they think about that, but they make decisions for a host of reasons. What I think is that it doesn't really matter that much, because any band that has put out 15 albums - most of which are excellent, any band that has toured extensively across the world for the last 35 years and played thousands of dates, any band that has succeeded in the end of their career more than during their meteoric rise to fame, any band that meets all of these criteria owes their fans nothing. Not a damn thing.Doesn't a band or manager think about the public, the audience? Or about own creativity? We, discussing this, it certainly happens, so it is relevant out here isn't it? It might not have impact. Although, I do think the band is certainly busy with the hunger of the fans.
In that case, it's irrelevant to you what happens to the band themselves. I would be dismayed, too, but I think seeing the band get a #1 album would be pretty incredible. I would feel good about being a part of that success.The best for people who make money out of it, but not necesserily for me ot other fans who are not busy with status.
No, but you often act as if they owe you things. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet. Nobody's making you stay a fan.They do not owe us anything. But we do not owe anything to them either. I do not owe them applause for every decision they have made or will make.