Did you see the last picture I posted? Back in 2002/2003, there was an absolutely unprecedented public opposition to the US invasion of Iraq in most western countries. I was there. I joined many of the protests. There were up to a million people on the streets on some occasions. The difference? A lot of these protests came from countries that were on the side of the invader. People didn't want this war, and we made this clear before the first bomb was even dropped. It's not fair to cry "hypocrisy!" if the majority of the people living in western countries tried to prevent this war but were powerless to stop it. So does that mean we're not allowed to be shocked by the sudden, literally over-night reappearance of open war in Europe after decades of us thinking this sort of thing was history? And we're not allowed to be terrified by the sudden realisation that there is nothing we, as ordinary people, can do about it? Just because there are other wars too?
I understand what you are saying, Indeed people were protesting against Irak war in USA back then, and today Russians are protesting against Ukraine war, so it's almost the same in this aspect. And also I do agree that you are allowed to be shocked by the sudden war in Europe, war is very bad.
I still see some differences when I think in term of agressor country vs victim country, some of them are :
1) On the internet, everybody is glorifying the Ukrainians who are fighting Russia back and calling them Heroes and supporting them in fighting Russians (And to make it clear I agree that they should fight back and not give their homes for free). On the contrary, I saw no such things for Irak people when they manage to kill American soldiers or destroy their vehicles. If anything, they probably were called terrorists, I am not sure tho. Why didn't the western people support (with thoughts and prayers at least) the Irak people in fighting back the Americans ? Why didn't they call them Heroes ?
2) Everybody is making Putin look like a super villain almost on the same level as Hitler and saying that he should be removed / exciled / jailed, but when George Bush did the same people were much more forgiving (I know he is still hated to this day, but not to the same level as Putin), they even elected him again in 2004. I understand that Putin is a dictator, and Bush was not, but still, it seems strange to me.
3) People are almost not allowed to say that they support Russia, I have seen on LinkedIn some Indian CEO or executive sayting that he supports Russia and Putin, because when the West turned against India, Russia supported India. I have seen people calling him out in the comments saying that this is disgraceful (some people disagreed with him respectfully tho). Did people who supported Bush or USA back then receive the same amount of criticism ? As far as I know, No.
Do you really think that the threatment of agressor and victim county is the same in both cases ?