On Sunday I watched The Snow Society. I was really confused with the whole movie, because it's the story of the Andes survivors from 1972. My first thought was... isn't this "Alive?" Is it a remake? Can you remake a "true story?" What's going on? Well... What's going on is that this is based on a different book, what else, but "The Snow Society." According the the book's branding it is, "The definitive story of what happened back in 1972, For the first time the 16 survivors tell all." I told my brother, "So they held stuff back when they first told the story in 1972? I mean, we already know what they did to survive two and a half months in the middle of nowhere soooo.... what could possibly be new?
As it turns out... nothing. It literally is the same thing. HOWEVER, things that changed. In the first book and movie Fernando "Nando" Parrado comes out as the protagonist/hero. Others were criticized by the public as "weak" for having very understandable breakdowns. This movie does a better job of making sure there are no heroes or weaklings. Everyone is shown in a very vulnerable state at some point. So I liked that, the credit for the group's survival is spread around much more equally. Very powerful movie, I was in tears by the end, not so much because of what they went through, but the first book and movie are basically part of my personal cannon along with Man's Search for Meaning, The Alchemist and Into the Wild. I'm not going to say it was a religious experience, but it was definitely more than just watching a movie.