Especially if all these legal issues involve songs being played on the tour.
They are, but drum parts don't merit a writing credit usually, similar to guitar solos.
I expect that is the same scenario as Gangland, where Clive Burr got a writing credit. I assume the drum intro to Gangland spawned the rest of the song
As already observed, he is a "serial litigant" - he's been there, done that and got the t-shirt. He knows how the system works. I think he intends to cause as much trouble as he can.Regardless of involvement in specific sets of lyrics, Dave probably gets the next biggest cut (after Steve) of the royalties from all earlier work. But yes, I can see other musicians coming out of the woodwork now the flood gates have been opened. I think the thing I like least about McKay's involvement is that his last statement basically came across as a threat - next time I come calling, give me exactly what I ask for, or else.
Because if they hadn't capitulated on the Quinn case, the next thing he intended to do was insist Steve and Dave be cross-examined under oath. This would be a serious incursion on their personal time, because it's a part of the process they can't delegate. So if he tries it again (and he will, if he thinks it will work) they would have no choice but to suspend the tour while they fight the court case.How could McKay bring the tour to a stop just from song writing accusations? Neither HBTN case stopped them touring. Also, bit of a dick move for the hundreds of thousands of fans wanting to see the tour regardless of who wrote the songs.
He’s sounding more and more like the Mr McKay in Porridge, except this isn’t funny.Because if they hadn't capitulated on the Quinn case, the next thing he intended to do was insist Steve and Dave be cross-examined under oath. This would be a serious incursion on their personal time, because it's a part of the process they can't delegate. So if he tries it again (and he will, if he thinks it will work) they would have no choice but to suspend the tour while they fight the court case.
Oh, and I don't think McKay cares about being popular somehow.
Talking of royalties from earlier work, didn't they sell the rights to the back catalogue around the time Bruce came back? I'm sure there was something of the sort but I'm not certain of the details.
Because if they hadn't capitulated on the Quinn case, the next thing he intended to do was insist Steve and Dave be cross-examined under oath. This would be a serious incursion on their personal time, because it's a part of the process they can't delegate. So if he tries it again (and he will, if he thinks it will work) they would have no choice but to suspend the tour while they fight the court case.
Oh, and I don't think McKay cares about being popular somehow.
Well I'm glas I'll be seeing Iron Maiden early on in the tour.
This is what I think he's counting on - depending on how many "claimants" he can find and drag out of the woodwork he can keep coming back and basically say "pay up or I'll finish you as a touring unit".Well, if there was a threat to the tour, they could easily get out of it by paying the ransom money.
I don't think he cares about this either.Actually sabotaging the tour wouldn't win much public sympathy for the cause, either.
^ This.I case (or potential case) involving alleged plagiarism is not going to stop the band from touring, regardless of where or when they are "served" (unless literally the entire setlist is comprised of allegedly stolen material, which it certainly won't be).
I understand that McKay comes off like a prick, and the whole situation is very sad/bad/etc, but people are honestly blowing things way out of proportion.
Yup. Could you imagine the countersuit(s) from the Maiden camp, not to mention the horrible publicity for McKay, if he actually did succeed in stopping them from touring? Not gonna happen.^ This.
There will be no tour stopping. Get a grip folks.