Eddies Wingman said:
Eddies Wingman said:
And that discussion about BTATS was quite hot ...
It was hot but I'd rather say it was
rare. These two members usually don't disagree often, at least not in such a manner.
I'd like to have something off my chest, and maybe I shouldn't bring it up, out in the open, but recently I had a "friendly warning" kind of pm from a mod who was -in my eyes- not clear in what I'd exactly done and/or what was wrong about it. My behaviour was mentioned, but I missed examples, and the whole thing felt kind of unfair to me.
The pm was done in a friendly tone, so that was good. But I missed contextual explanation and questioning.
Initially I reacted angrily because I thought it should have been explained better. A day later or so, no answer, so I thought: fuck it, I'm not going to let this spoil my fun here. I sent another pm to tell them to forget about it. As you can see, that's not always easy for me.
Moral of my story: this forum has cooled down very much, which is good. But I do not hope that mods (and forumers) react too strict on certain deviations.
If I may have one suggestion for the mods: When someone complains to you about something, and it's not about clear blunt offending, it'd be good to investigate
both parties well before judgement comes. I'd appreciate that. Thank you.