I liked Angel of Retribution a lot when it was fresh and it stands up well today.
Here's the thing. All Judas Priest albums are calculated; they step into the studio with a definite goal and work to achieve it.
And that's as true for Retribution as well.
But what bothers me a little (even as I get how the reunion is a good reason for why) is that instead of reaching forward and exploring things they haven't done before, this one looks back at everything they have, and ticks off each requisite box.
Fortunately, they tend to be very good at each of these boxes, and I like each of these boxes, so the album is a good listen. The sound is fantastic the pacing works (Judas Rising isn't as highly rated by me as it is by others, but it is a perfect opener) and the songs tend to be good to very good. I find Lochness kinda silly and overwrought, but Angel is one of my all-time favourite true ballads.
It slid in at 11 for me, but there's not much between 11 and 6 on my list, which represents the "very good".
Here's the thing. All Judas Priest albums are calculated; they step into the studio with a definite goal and work to achieve it.
And that's as true for Retribution as well.
But what bothers me a little (even as I get how the reunion is a good reason for why) is that instead of reaching forward and exploring things they haven't done before, this one looks back at everything they have, and ticks off each requisite box.
Fortunately, they tend to be very good at each of these boxes, and I like each of these boxes, so the album is a good listen. The sound is fantastic the pacing works (Judas Rising isn't as highly rated by me as it is by others, but it is a perfect opener) and the songs tend to be good to very good. I find Lochness kinda silly and overwrought, but Angel is one of my all-time favourite true ballads.
It slid in at 11 for me, but there's not much between 11 and 6 on my list, which represents the "very good".
Last edited: