Back to the time frame: born on or after January 1, 1 AD?
4. Yes, he was born after 1 AD......born on or after January 1, 1 AD?
You know, I'd kind of forgotten LC said this. Thankfully, still compliant...I say the rule is that whoever picks MUST pick a different profession and country of origin/fame from the previous question.
Yes, just to confirm those other points (> Mongolian & Military).Let's see... male, born in the first millenium AD, not Mongolian, not a philosopher or military.
5. No, he was not an Artist...Artist?
6. Yes Flash, he was European...Was he European?
7. No, he was not a Politician.Was this person a politician?
8. No, he has no association (that I know of) with Nottinghamshire.Did the activities he is best known for take place in the general area of Nottinghamshire?
What is your definition of "Roman citizen"?Was he a Roman citizen?
That's still a fairly complicated question...You know, those who had citizenship within the Roman Empire (since we are talking in AD). Civis Romanus sum... That would define better the time frame. Maybe i should rephrase: Did he have Roman citizenship?
Yes, just to confirm those other points (> Mongolian & Military).
Aye, alright. It is well defined, but how do you know whether it's a complicated question in this instance or not?No, it's not. Roman citizenship is a very well-defined thing. Did he possess it or not?
9. No, he did not have Roman citizenship...Did he have Roman citizenship?
Tough shit.I'm sorry, the mathematician in me can't let that symbol abuse stand. You could have used ~,, ≠, =/= or even the horrible <>, but > isn't right.