Well you
are wrong. I deemed your acknowledgement that those lacking formal education can be brighter than those with true and important, that suggests the opposite of what you thought you saw.
@GhostofCain's sentiment follows statistical averages. You weren't wrong to point out that high formal education doesn't
necessitate brightness or, in this case, familiarity with science. Then I made the point, with the acknowledgement mentioned above, that
@GhostofCain's sentiment is understandable because averages are not rendered irrelevant by the deviations.
Someone who has attained high level education at a prestigious level is subject to qualifiers. Those qualifiers decrease the number of people who will slip through the cracks, if said qualifiers are robust. It takes a certain level of cognitive capability to be able to reach levels of higher education, especially at prestigious institutions of higher education. That's a pretty significant qualifier, so the percentage of people who slip through the cracks is smaller. Those with greater cognitive capability are less likely to be idiots in terms of knowledge and reasoning, so that's another qualifier. You still have idiots slipping through the cracks, hence my acknowledgement of your point, but the percentage is small compared to the uneducated,
for no reason but the fact there are qualifiers related to cognitive capability in one sample group, and none for the other, which in this case would be everyone who doesn't have high level formal education, a group that includes myself, mind you.