Bruce Dickinson

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
Interviewers were instructed not to ask Bruce about Roy. I think this applied to all interviews.
Or can anyone find an interview where the interviewer did ask about it (after the partnership ended)?
Normally, an interviewer would consider that a topic worth covering.
I believe there were private/personal issues involved, not just disagreements about tours or recordings.
Yes, Prickinson sounds personal.
what is lunch meat? Has that anything to do with Bruce?
 
This is next level wrong on his part...
we don't know the whole story, it's probably personal (not started by Bruce, I think he should blame only himself), but Bruce made the right decision. Just look at this. The chemistry of his new band is great. TMP is one of the most unimpressive and disappointing albums in terms of guitar playing (3-4 interesting parts, imo). Who would have thought that such a fallout would happen between them. Maybe his work on the remixes was also very slow, but his comments burned all the bridges, before and after.
 
This is next level wrong on his part...
we don't know the whole story, it's probably personal (not started by Bruce, I think he should blame only himself), but Bruce made the right decision. Just look at this. The chemistry of his new band is great. TMP is one of the most unimpressive and disappointing albums in terms of guitar playing (3-4 interesting parts, imo). Who would have thought that such a fallout would happen between them. Maybe his work on the remixes was also very slow, but his comments burned all the bridges, before and after.

If you do not have a clue about what happened how can you categorically say it was not started by Bruce???
 
I personally would love to know what really happened. It is a shame that it has put an end to the partnership that created The Chemical Wedding, one of the best metal albums of the 90s and an all time favourite of mine (one of my desert island discs).
 
Back
Top