Bruce Dickinson

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
Robert.M. said:
Because it really stands out when you see recent photos of Bruce.
And pretending the elephant in the room isn't there would be really weird.
Besides, dickinson1978 is right: teeth play an important role for a singer.
Click to expand...
Easy solution: Stop worry about her personal Instragram pictures. It's from her personal sphere (and "her account isn't set to private isn't an argument in favor of that we should discuss her pictures of their lives together). Just because they are out there doesn't mean people should obsess over them, because considering this is like the tenth time we're at "look at how she's photoshopping/IG filtering stuff lol", people are obsessing and gossiping. That's far more ridiculous than her using IG "filters" like millions of others out there.
 
Last edited:
Yax said:
Easy solution: Stop worry about her personal Instragram pictures. It's from her personal sphere (and "her account isn't set to private isn't an argument in favor of that we should discuss her pictures of their lives together). Just because they are out there doesn't mean people should obsess over them, because considering this is like the tenth time we're at "look at how she's photoshopping/IG filtering stuff lol", people are obsessing and gossiping. That's far more ridiculous than her using filters like millions of others out there.
Click to expand...
I dont worry is just those are not his old teeth. They can photoshop anything they want. Is normal. But i dont see bruce changing now his teeth.thats all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yax
Here we go again with this argument from people who still don’t get the Internet: If you post something for everyone to see, you can’t expect no one to comment on it or discuss it. That is not obsessing. If you consider something private, there’s a specific option to set your account to “Private” Posting something publicly and treating it as private at the same time is just nonsense.

Besides, I really did wonder if Bruce might have done something to his teeth, which, as a fan of his singing, worried me a bit.

That’s why I was glad to see dickinson1978’s response, and up until that “holier-than-thou comment” about privacy, I found the discussion funny and interesting.
 
Robert.M. said:
Here we go again with this argument from people who still don’t get the Internet: If you post something for everyone to see, you can’t expect no one to comment on it or discuss it. That is not obsessing. If you consider something private, there’s a specific option to set your account to “Private” Posting something publicly and treating it as private at the same time is just nonsense.
Click to expand...
Then maybe the tabloids would be a more appropriate venue for the "lol Leana's photoshopping is ridiculous", not the thread about Bruce Dickinson's professional work. We used to have actual and enforced rules against this stuff on the forum.

If we were discussing the prospects of him fixing his teeth, then yeah, it does relate to singing and would be valid, like Dickinson1978 did, but there was a fair bit of lolling, as it always is as soon as a pic from her IG is posted, especially on Dorothea's part. Personally, I just think it looks obvious the picture has been worked, so I'm not the least concerned about his teeth.
 
Last edited:
No, the forum rules have been changed so that you can discuss all aspects of the band members. And that’s really the only logical way to do it, because the idea that you can somehow separate aspects of a person—that a life isn’t a whole, where everything is interconnected—is really strange.
This photo and Bruce’s teeth are actually a good example of that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top