Really nice find.
Good to know that we live in an unlikely universe.
Good to know that we live in an unlikely universe.
Some stuff from 1998 is archived here as well:Do you (or anyone) have got more interviews from around that time?
Thanks, that's very cool, but the "heavy stuff" isn't in any of these.
By 1996, Bruce was pretty much a "has-been", his career seemed to be over after only 3 years solo. Later he said he even thought about giving up music as a career during that time. How he managed to become successful again after that, eventually even more so than ever before, I find extremely fascinating, and I think it has a lot to do with his personality. Let's say he wasn't afraid to take "dirty roads" to get the attention he wanted.
So what I'm really wondering is, did those interviews help or hurt Bruce more? Not in a moral way, just "matter of fact". Accident of Birth was a success after all... I'm very interested to know what you guys think.I think it was in a series of interviews in 97, in promotion for Accident, where he accused Steve of being responsible for No Prayer sounding like "shit" (that's the word he used iirc), of being a control freak that hasn't ever tried drugs and never ever gets drunk (one question in the interview posted by Talisman hints at that), etc. etc., basically of everything that was "wrong" in the world. I can't remember everything he said, but it was just nasty, just seeking attention in whatever way he could, even if it was completely unfair, ridiculous and dishonest (afaik Bruce didn't get drunk very often himself and was anti-drugs pretty much since the 80s, but hey, he wanted the headline). I can perfectly understand Steve being mad at him afterwards.
(About the sources: Kerrang 660 may be one of those interviews, but as I've said I haven't found any of them anywhere on the net... they've magically disappeared... And I don't have my teenage-years-magazines anymore. Some people here might remember too though.)
No disrespect, but I think Bruce is a big-mouthed guy. He can say stupid or even offensive things just to get attention.
Fantastic interview. I didn't know it. Thanks a lot.I think this is the interview you are mentioning: http://www.bookofhours.net/beta/inter_960428.htm There are others in this website. I always wondered why Bruce would say something like that about Steve, but now that you mentioned this probable reason, it makes sense. I hadn't thought about it from this perspective.
Foregone? After some 30+ years reading the guy's interviews and attending gigs, I think there are some facts behind this conclusion. I mean, he sometimes goes to far, just for the sake of talking. And not a dickhead ? When he insults a fan calling him fatboy ? I know the guy had behaved badly, but this kind of stuff goes far beyond what is tolerable.I think that's a foregone conclusion at this point. He isn't a dickhead or anything but he has let his passion get in the way of reason at times in the past. It's especially evident in his rants during gigs.
Bruce commented on how corporations in the USA interfered with concerts (giving the best seats to affiliated people with no interest for the band). I am not a big fan of Maiden's commercial activities but they can't be compared that easily with the stuff he ranted about.The thing is you get trapped in your own contradictions very easily when you adopt such an attitude. To insult someone because of his asocial behavior, and blame "corporate bullshit" when you sell beer, tee-shirts and so on to your fans and when your are providing "motivational" conferences to corporations employees... I don't know.
I love him when he performs. He is the best performer on the world.I love him when he sings and write lyrics.
Albums, concerts. Pears, apples. Very different environments.It's nice he expresses his opinions, but when he does so via lyrics, he comes out looking much smarter.