JudasMyGuide
Ancient Mariner
Is it sacrilege for my to say I don't own a live album other than Live After Death and I couldn't tell you the track listing for Live/Dead?
Is it sacrilege for me to say I don't own Live After Death?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2da8/b2da884aabe7186b421a3342baf6ec202cd2550f" alt="Ninja :ninja: :ninja:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e88/82e889d7f6b9aaa8b92c19673f6127203795edc0" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
Is it sacrilege for my to say I don't own a live album other than Live After Death and I couldn't tell you the track listing for Live/Dead?
Is it sacrilege for my to say I don't own a live album other than Live After Death and I couldn't tell you the track listing for Live/Dead?
I don't, only some of the tracks. Bruce are not top motivated on some songs, like ProwlerI do like them.
No. Maiden aren't deities, we're not bringing service to them and there is no church to impose its dogma on you.
p
Bruce is way better on Live/Dead than on LAD (or Maiden England...) He's fucking awesome on Rock in Rio, but I prefer the sound of Live/Dead. RiR also suffers from the cut-and-pasting of the vocals where in reality Bruce let the audience sing - really a shame, and it's Steve's fault. My fave is En Vivo.
I also can't watch the video of RiR, which is just shit, sorry. Which brings me back to the feud between Steve and Bruce, because as far as I understand Steve is responsible for the editing of that video, and I think the cuts are so crazy fast in order to have an excuse for not showing Bruce. I guess Steve needed longer to come to his senses and let go of some ego crap - which you can also see in the reunion-interview Talisman posted, where he still fires against Bruce. As soon Bruce was back with Maiden, he was pretty loyal and professional and chose other targets to get the headlines (Metallica, Ozzy). Which again supports my theory that Bruce can be very "rational" in losing his temper.
The country and western thing that Ling wrote about in that article was from 1998! He didn't say anything negative about Bruce after he rejoined the band:I guess Steve needed longer to come to his senses and let go of some ego crap - which you can also see in the reunion-interview Talisman posted, where he still fires against Bruce.
To a certain extent, Harris shares my disbelief that the reunion has come this far.
“I didn’t think it would work either - until we met with Bruce,” he admits. “Both sides had their say in the [official] Run To The Hills book, but there didn’t seem to be any harm in going to a meeting with him. And it went very well. His attitude was exactly where I wanted it to be. My only worry was that he was acting like that because he knew that’s what we wanted to hear. But so far that’s not proven to be the case. With all this stuff he’s been saying onstage, he’d look pretty silly if he just bailed out at the end of all this.
“That said, I think Bruce is a changed man,” he continues. “A lot of that’s to do with him sorting out his personal life. He’s as happy as a pig in shit with his new aeroplane and being back in the band. We’ve been pretty much on the same wavelength from the start.”
he was pretty loyal and professional and chose other targets to get the headlines (Metallica, Ozzy). Which again supports my theory that Bruce can be very "rational" in losing his temper.