Albie said:Leave at least one option for 9.
I don't see why that is necessary.
Albie said:Leave at least one option for 9.
Eddies Wingman said:On a more serious note: I think there is one problem with the reunion era albums, and that is that many songs feel dragged out more than they need to (it really started with Virtual XI, though). However, the song writing as a whole is more consistent now. In my book, the lesser songs from this era are miles ahead of the lesser songs from the 80s and early 90s. So, I can understand that some don't like the new Maiden era as much, if they prefer for example NOTB, The Trooper and Wrathchild over longer songs like Phantom of the Opera or Rime of the Ancient Mariner. There are not many songs of that kind past 2000, and several of them sound forced (like Wildest Dreams, Different World and The Final Frontier - musically they are all just lesser versions of The Wicker Man anyway). It's like they are there because the band felt they had to include some short, fast songs.
As for me, I love many of the longer songs from the modern era as well.
Chartwel said:Now, I didn't say it's a BAD song... I really enjoy 2 Minutes, especially for its place in the metal lexicon. But one of their best ever? I wouldn't say that. And that's my heresy
Oh, I'm aware of the origin of the song - I'm not critiquing Steve's dreams! - but I think the execution is still a bit... cheesy. I think we can all agree that Maiden have their Spinal Tap moments ("and I danced! and I pranced!") and I think this is a big one. I actually think the opening of the song is superb, and it attempts to build to a crescendo, but the chorus is... horrible. I noted on one of the other threads on worst lyrics that I think NOTB has some of them, like Steve's dream providing great verses but he couldn't think of anything to tie them together in a chorus, so we get excrementally bad lines like "6-6-6! The one for you and me!" It's the chorus more than anything else that makes the song so bad.
As a "not really religious nut but a Catholic," I think a song on the Book of Revelations could be incredibly interesting, especially given how good Maiden is on epics. This one, though, leaves me frowning... the fact that "religious nuts" COULD hang their hat on this one meant that it wasn't done well. Could have been more subtle. Could have been better! I cringe when I hear it in concert, because there are so many other classics that they could play. Maybe it's the devil's work
BLASPHEMY!Ranko said:Exactly! I got crappy Dance of Death instead of PFD last year as well!
Mkoh said:Pretty much every Maiden album has at least one or two songs that make me reach for "next" button. But Chains of Misery isn't one of them.
It will allow me to vote for it.LooseCannon said:I don't see why that is necessary.
LooseCannon said:In the Daily Song thread, I'm seriously considering making a selection of 10s the only options for Paschendale.
Mkoh said:Pretty much every Maiden album has at least one or two songs that make me reach for "next" button. But Chains of Misery isn't one of them.
Albie said:It will allow me to vote for it.
Abas said:Correctomundo
I love the Fear of the Dark album, in my opinion there's no song I don't like
Rotam said:Even the one "what you gonna do on Monday" ?
Rotam said:Even the one "what you gonna do on Monday" ?
I'll pretend you didn't say that.Teddie said:There does seem to be a lot of love for the reunion albums on this forum...
They just don't have the energy the earlier albums had.
I want to rock out and not hear yet another power ballad about some soldier being killed in a war...
chaosapiant said:There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who like Paschendale, and those who don't.
Stallion Duck said:I'll pretend you didn't say that.