I think you're misinterpreting what Magnus is saying. Now I don't want to speak for Magnus per se (and keep in mind that I am with you 99% of the time in this thread), but what I don't think he's saying is "leftists are the reason people are turning to fascism". I think what he means is that "people who call themselves leftists give off the impression that they are better than people who are not leftists and talk down to them, which pushes those people away from their cause and towards hungry fascists ready to swallow them up into their political movement."
First of all, thank you for the thorough response. I appreciate it. I actually agree with quite a few of the raised points and will detail any points of disagreement further down.
I think in a broad sense this is true. I was listening to a podcast today that made the case that the Democrats are seen as the party of elites (no matter how backwards that may be given the Republican nominee who won is a literal billionaire), and this has continually made them lose ground with rural voters (which is not the whole of why the Dems lost the election but certainly does not help them year after year). Certainly the "Twitter leftists" do not leave centrists and right-wingers with a positive taste in their mouths, although I would argue that this has more to do with the fact that the right has taken control of the narrative on "cancel culture" and spun it for use towards their own agendas. But that narrative is out there and it's up to us to change that.
Maybe it's a difference in how the word "leftist" is used, but that's one of those words, just like communist or socialist, that are thrown around without care even when they don't apply. Not everyone on the left is a leftist; the latter requires socialist and anti-capitalist beliefs. So, while I understand that the Dems are seen as the party of the elites (and as you said, that's quite the hypocritical assessment nowadays), the Dems don't have any leftists among their rangs. There's a reason why they are seen as a center right party globally, despite being attacked as "radical far left communists" by the MAGA movement. I obviously won't defend the "Twitter leftists", which are a special kind of unhinged (enter Jer's "that's you Vaenyr" jabs and jokes
). Furthermore, I would argue given the small amount of leftists both in the US and globally, that I don't think they meaningfully affect the numbers. It's a tiny minority compared to conservatives, moderates and liberals. As we've seen with this election, the majority of people voted with the economy in mind. I'm sure there are examples of people being pushed to the right by folks on the left, but I can't imagine this is a meaningful number overall. Contrarians exists, but most people don't choose their political affiliation to spite groups they find annoying. That's my perception at least.
As for smugness, I would argue that this isn't unique to any political affiliation. Yes, leftists can be overly smug and annoying. So can liberals. But as we've seen in the last week with how sore winners the right wing is, so can conservatives and moderates as well. Not to mention centrists who bash in both directions (though interestingly enough in many cases they mostly attack the left).
(Edit: Forgot to add, in my opinion there's a bit of double standards at play. Most people will happily shit on far right loonies; same with left wing loonies. The far left is characterized as attacking everyone right, while the right wing and center keep attacking the far left as well. I get the mud slinging, but this perception of the left being responsible is misguided in my opinion. A common argument, also seen in this thread at times, it's that it is "common sense" to be against the far right
and the far left. While that can be arguable, I see constant hostility and attacks on the left from the center and the right, yet mostly the left is held accountable and called out.
To summarize, in my experience different groups are held to different standards and the criticisms aren't dished out in equal measure.)
I think Magnus is saying that the way you post gives the impression of a hound dog who knows better than everyone else and chases after people for having opinions different to yours. I'm not saying I necessarily agree - I think you do a really good job of combating the batshit stuff posted in this thread in general - however I can understand that some of the things you say in your posts can come across to those not already on the left as being 'holier than thou'. I also can't really see myself doing any better though. The political landscape is fucking frustrating and I hate that people's rights are on the ballet every single year and that does not lead me to make good judgement calls on my own part. It's maddening.
I can understand the impression, but I don't really care if people have the same opinion with me or not - otherwise Virtual XI wouldn't be my favorite Maiden album
Jokes aside, opinions are subjective, while the things I mostly take issue with in this thread are either obvious falsehoods presented as facts or glaring hypocrisy after being told and shown the opposite and yet still doubling down.
@Detective Beauregard was going on a weird rant about how Pride month unnecessary and "insane" and why there isn't a Veteran's month, when in reality the latter exists. I, as a foreigner (and other users of course too), had to explain to an American citizen things about his country that he
should know better if he has such a strong opinion on the matter. How are you supposed to talk about that stuff and correct obviously wrong information without sounding as if you're talking down? Or how we were talking about the Harris and Biden campaigns, how the former is objectively more right-wing than the latter's in many instances (constantly promising positions to Republicans, bragging about the most lethal army, parading the Cheneys around, constantly trying to appeal to moderates), how it did not focus on identity politics even though Biden's did, yet we have
@Jer ranting and bashing the trans community, who felt it was so important to take the opportunity to "bite at the chance" to go after me (to steal your wording) that he completely ignored the actual subject and context we were talking about to raise irrelevant grievances. Such unwarranted attacks, based on a faulty premise, which attack a marginalized community I care about need to be called out, in my opinion. Maybe it's insufferable, but so is transphobia.
As for me in particular, I am aware of my flaws. I can be a difficult person to deal with. I can be petty and vindictive. I am definitely stubborn. I am sure many users here roll with their eyes the moment they see that I wrote another lengthy post in the thread. At the end of the day I am who I am though. People are free to put me on ignore if they think I don't contribute anything to the thread. They can scroll on by, or they can call me out if they want. As I mentioned before, if we're talking about objective statements I will stand my ground when those are falsified. I get that my positions and the way I express them can be polarizing and I am trying to reign in my worst impulses. For many that's not nearly enough and that's a valid stance as well. You can't please everyone and if I come across as a "holier than thou" obnoxious and insufferable leftist, then so be it.
But saying stuff like "this will be fun" definitely makes it feel like you're ready to bite at any chance you get when I don't think Magnus came for you with nearly the same tone. Magnus can be a jokester from time to time but I think his comments are serious concerns that we on the left need to start taking to heart in order to sway people's minds, as difficult as that truly is.
Then I must've misjudged and misread his tone. I'm not as familiar with him as other members here, since we haven't interacted that much so far. Maybe the "#IgnoranceIsNoExcuse" joke and a couple of posts flew over my head , maybe I saw hostility where there was none. Maybe I interpreted obvious jokes as "poking the bear". If I misjudged your tone and position
@Magnus, then I sincerely apologize. I'll cut out the snark.