Flaming Blimp Crash
Ancient Mariner
I think the funny (not haha funny, but, y'know) part about today is watching conservatives that are big on limited government suddenly celebrating the executive's newfound immunity.
I think they have proved that for years and years, but this is indeed the cherry on top. Presidents should not be made kings.Today exemplifies the need to gut the Supreme Court and make the justices have term limits and have their appointments be voted for by the people.
Can you imagine how the Reps would have acted if Obama had lost in 2012 and not willingly ceded?If a president can just take any treasonous action he wants because he's in office, then the system is flat out broken. And that's what this SCOTUS immunity decision is doing. A man will not be held accountable for being the cause of an attack against the government itself. And if it were anyone but Trump, this wouldn't be the case.
That's the scenario I was thinking of. Or if Biden pulled that shit nowadays. It'd likely devolve right into a civil war.Can you imagine how the Reps would have acted if Obama had lost in 2012 and not willingly ceded?
Didn't have the time to fact check it
The top priority needs to be winning Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. If the candidate can win these three states, they can lose all other swing states and still get 270 votes. Of these three, Michigan seems most liable to flip to Trump. With that in mind, I would go for Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer as she has built a really strong coalition there and would be formidable in the other two states as well. I would also settle for any other governor such as Pritzker (IL), Polis (CO), or Shapiro (PA).Who would you guys choose as Biden's replacement?
I think Whitmer has a reasonably good chance at being selected, but right now I actually think Kamala Harris is the most likely and straightforward pick. We're starting to see data that she is marginally stronger against Trump than Biden and this would be the easiest way to avoid convention drama and marginalizing black voters. I don't think it's the right decision or the right calculation, but if Biden steps aside on his own I could easily see them putting Kamala out there so she can go straight to campaigning against Trump instead of trying to consolidate support at the convention (and at this point nobody is going to challenge her as it would be futile).Who do you think it'll be?
Yes. This is where I have the strongest disagreements with people on here who are against replacing Biden. Instead of looking at Biden as the only democrat who could beat Trump, I think we should look at Hillary Clinton as the only democrat who could lose to Trump (unless Biden loses as well). We're still talking about a convicted felon who the majority of voters dislike and who has been repeatedly repudiated at the ballot box in general elections and in midterms. If Trump wins again it will be, once again, entirely a candidate problem on the part of Democrats. If you run a younger governor from a swing state, Trump's entire argument is deflated. He can't run against Biden's age or record. The race will become a referendum on Trump and Trump can't win that race.Do you think any of the replacements can defeat Trump?