But a lot of these deep cuts are only played the odd time. Whereas Maiden bust out a huge percentage of new albums, every night on tour, which means if you did the maths, and I'm fairly sure someone on here did before, Maiden are mopping the floor with Metallica when it comes to the proportion of their back catalogue that has been played over 50 times live.
And from those cuts we have live releases, bootlegs and so on.
Where I fail to see the point of people like Diesel 11 is, you're not attending 99% of the gigs yet you desire it to be always in the same format so there's absolutely no chance they fail to meet your expectations once you see them. In the end diversity of what's been left behind hurts a lot. In 10 years time Maiden will cease to play live and with that any chance of getting these gems out dies. What's a gem to someone is shit to another, yes, someone might hate CSiT but it does deserve to be played live at least once more, desires of all the Diesel 11s and other attenders of that particular gig that wish not the be negatively surprised at the unannounced setlist change be damned.
There are many, many more people who have seen the recording of Frayed Ends live, than those who were in the audience. Metallica knew a lot of that audience isn't really into the song. But they did it once, for fucks sake, for the rest of us and for history.
That's why Maiden approach is inferior - it caters to the average fan only.
Also this only touches the main live performances, where are all the other live exposures, TV shows, one time specials? Nowhere, there are none.
About the Russia thing, I can't discern now whether Perun was intentionally sarcastic - that kind of response was exactly what I was writing about, going tangents about things out of context. I hate the little Kremlin gimp (I was about to post Bald's recent Ukraine/Donbass video that I've watched at 3AM yesterday then went sleeping) as much as the next normal person, let's just get that out of the way. I mean if you're Jewish, you might get triggered by someone that doesn't know you're jewish and you're talking about mustache. So he refers to Charlie Chaplin's mustache via another name and now you start an out of context political rant. It's ok to switch subjects if one feels so but it is not relevant for the discussion at hand. I talk about generic approach the other biggest metal band ever took, in exposing their live work to the audience, and then someone strays of with talk about inferior albums in last 20 years.