Reincarnation of Benjamin Breeg Video

"Let me take you on an awkward LYRICAL journey" would be more apt verbiage, methinks.

Although the lyrics improve markedly as the track progresses, the half spoken introductory monologue harkens back to many a Harris coined 
"first person" soliloquy - bizarre, so many of his inventions (even the tortured ones) seem to be so amenable...

Compare the above with say, Pachendale;
"Let me tell you about his years"

Or Dance Of Death;
"Let me tell you a story to chill the bones"

"Let me tell you about my dreams"
Honestly, you didn't think it necessary to ask our permission the previous fifteen-hundred times you've shared your nocturnal reveries with us! Where's the assertiveness of your youth gone, man?

Anyhow, the opening stanzas came as something of an icy shower after the warm, and colourful Somewhere In Time-esque instrumental.

Concerning the main body of the track, yes, it's the standard tale of self-exoneration and amelioration that we've all become well aquainted with over the years, set against the backdrop of an otherworldly reality - again, a vista drawn on perhaps once too often.

"Demons are trapped all inside of my head"
If Steve commits words that are even remotely concurrent to those above to paper again, I may have to shoot him. Stop. Please. Stop.

"I'm able to see things - things I don't wanna see"
Perhaps I've had one Earl Grey too many this evening, but every time I hear this lyric, I hear an echo of some airheaded floozy from Generic Teen Grossout Movie IX;
"I tooootttaaalllly didn't want to see that."

In closing, I wish to make it plain that despite these shortcomings, the rudiments of a powerful, and sagacious subject matter are touched upon - namely, the aspirations of an unrighteous and amoral man to become a better person in his next life. Unfortunately, this uplifting message is benumbed by the nebulous imagery, and tired vocabulary.

As far as I'm concerned, with this composition, the final nail has been driven home in regards to Steve Harris' lyrical dexterity - but then again, I consider Bruce to be the only passable lyricist in Iron Maiden.
 
I agree with Urizen'sCataract as far that Steve's lyrics have become repetitive a bit but you have shown similarities with only two other songs.  Iron Maiden have over 150 songs.  If you look long and hard, you'll find that lyrics repeat with every artist, especially after such long careers :rolleyes:
 
The slow intro reminded me of the intro to Dance of Death and the solo is what really made the song for me, before that I was like, "It's ok, nothing special" Then the solo bitch slapped me in the face and told me "Like it!" so I did :D
 
My first post, yes I'm the same Leathco from the old Iron Maiden boards....such a shame it's IMFC paid members only now, but I won't open up that can of worms.

My thoughts on the first released song from the upcoming album....

As far as the music, it's a slow starter, but that's one powerful riff once it really opens up!  It does get a tad repetitive as the song goes on, and it's not expanded enough as well (too many power chords in this single, if we have 3 guitarists lets use them!) but still a very nice riff.  Also has that storytelling style that many Maiden songs have as well.  It's a good song, but prolly won't be one of the top 5 off of the new album.  I'm rating it 6/10.  Please remember 6/10 is NOT BAD, a nice song, just wish the band expanded more.

The video, on the other hand, was quite awful.  I didn't like the whole divide the screen into fours thing that went on for most of the video.  The studio clips were interesting, interspersed with shots from the lineup during different time periods, but dividing the screen constantly hurt it for me.  VIDEO:  3/10

I might just think better of this song upon more listens, and if I can hear a higher quality version as well.

One more thing, I think this feels like a combination of No Prayer, X-Factor, and something rather fresh.  Perhaps it's deserving of a 7/10, we'll see after a few more listens.
 
About the song: I wasn't much impressed when I first heard it, but after about 20 listens, I must say that... I really don't like it at all!

To me, it's just a patchwork of older Maiden songs, and not even assembled properly. Then again, that's just me, eh?  :innocent:
 
I tend to agree with Mav here. It's simple for Maiden standards, and it suffers from the AatG syndrome, as RW pointed out. In dispite of this, I must say that I am most pleased with the sound. Steve's bass is back, the drums are sounding better than ever and together with the guitars it melts down to a warm sound, where all the instruments are filling eachother out.
Dave's solo is ok, but it's no major contribution to the song. It sounds like something he could have come up with in 5 minutes (which he probably did.) Nicko's air guitar is excellent, though.
 
New guy, old fan here.  The Reincarnation of Benjamin Breeg really struck me as The Reincarnation of Steve Harris...only this time he found some groove.  I agree things get a little repetative at times but the groove is sick and the breakdowns are even sicker.  Plus, Dave's solo is so different from what he usually plays but it's still his style and it still sounds good.  Then there's Bruce giving a damn near live performance and hitting incredible notes along the way.  If you take the words "melodic gallop" out of your Maiden dictionary for a moment and turn up the Black Sabbath CD in your head, you might dig this song a little more.
 
For me, I don't see the "repetitiveness" of this track a problem, or the length of it. In fact it went unnoticed due to me actually quite liking the track. I can see what you mean, Mav, about it been a "patchwork of older Maiden songs", but I guess after been around for 30 years and without drastically changing their sound it's inevitable it could end up sounding like this. The intro is typically Maiden, the guitar break typically Maiden, the pounding drive of the song so typically Maiden, etc.

I like it. :)
 
Maverick said:
About the song: I wasn't much impressed when I first heard it, but after about 20 listens, I must say that... I really don't like it at all!

But then again, did you like the following singles, when they came out?

The song with the best vocal lines ever (especially in the chorus) "Wildest Dreams"
The masterfully written "The Wicker Man"
The song with the least repetitive chorus ever "The Angel and The Gambler"
The absolutely non-commercial and absolutely not poppy sounding "Can I Play With Madness"
;-)

I think we finally have a single with a good chorus again. Apart from "Rainmaker" we hadn't hadn't such a privilege in ages. Also, the heaviness of the guitars are striking, and a nice overall mix !

Dance of Death --> Now that's an album with recycled ideas. I am glad that Maiden have chosen a new path, and I am very curious how the rest will sound.

Just my 2 cents of course
Cheers :)

p.s. This track is NOT repetitive. It has a chorus which returns 2 times. Does this make a song repetitive? That's bullshit.
 
Forostar said:
p.s. This track is NOT repetitive. It has a chorus which returns 2 times. Does this make a song repetitive? That's bullshit.
I guess the instrumental part before the solo can be seen as repetitive. Yet, I don't think so, and really like this song.
Mav (and the others as well), could you just tell us what you dislike in this song?
 
The links don't work for me!
Can someone put the song in mp3 here

please please please?
 
Ben said:
I guess the instrumental part before the solo can be seen as repetitive. Yet, I don't think so, and really like this song.
Mav (and the others as well), could you just tell us what you dislike in this song?

For me, the main thing the now standard slow bass intro and (wee snippet of) outro. I've heard it too many times on recent albums and just find it dull. I also agree with Maverick about the song being 'bits and pieces' affair. I keep on hearing elements of tracks from previous albums, especially Fear of the Dark and The X Factor, and Dave's solo sounds very familiar/samey. So to sum up, the song doesn't sound that new and the bass intro kills the immediacy of the track.
 
Well, when I first heard the new song, I thought it sounded quite fresh and different. Maybe because of the song's rhythm or its structure / tempo. It's a longer song, but it has fewer tempo changes than we are used to when it comes to Maiden. It keeps on rocking on without interrputions. It is also quite groovy. Some might find it repetitve, but I think it's in this case a good thing.

Well, I can imagine some think "Breeg" is a recycling of older ideas. But when I first heard the song I didn't think about it that much. I agree that the atmosphere is pretty reminiscent of The X-factor / Sign of the Cross (especially the instrumental passage). But since I liked that mood, I really don't mind it.
And ok, the the calm intro and the outro-idea is quite a recurring element on Maiden albums. But you might see such things also as the band's trademark, something recognizable. All depends on your point oif view.

I have a question to all of you who say that Maiden are repeating themselves:
- what would you like the upcoming album to sound like? What totally new elements would you like to hear?

I think it's very hard for a band who's been around already for so many years and who's released so many albums, to keep on surprising the fans. I think Maiden's strength doesn't lie in their ability to re-invent themselves, but more in their ablitity to keep producing solid albums and stay true to what they're good at.

Cliché but true: you can never satisfy everyone.
If Maiden suddenly came up with something totally different and new, many fans would start complaining about them "leaving their old style."
 
chouniard said:
The links don't work for me!
Can someone put the song in mp3 here

please please please?
That's against the forum rules but I'm sure there is probably a way to get it mate ;)
 
Conor said:
That's against the forum rules but I'm sure there is probably a way to get it mate ;)
Subtle as a brick, eh Conor. ;)

Forostar said:
p.s. This track is NOT repetitive. It has a chorus which returns 2 times. Does this make a song repetitive? That's bullshit.
The reason I suggested "repetitive" is that the track lasts over 7 minutes and excluding the intro/outro has the same beat throughout - not the repetitiveness of the chorus - this is why I double quoted it as it is not what some may consider a repetitive trait.
 
Albie said:
The reason I suggested "repetitive" is that the track lasts over 7 minutes and excluding the intro/outro has the same beat throughout - not the repetitiveness of the chorus - this is why I double quoted it as it is not what some may consider a repetitive trait.
Talking about the same "beat" throughout, do you mean time signature?

If you do, that's like saying that about 90% of songs are repetitive because they keep the same beat, or rhythm, the full way throughout.
 
Conor said:
If you do, that's like saying that about 90% of songs are repetitive because they keep the same beat, or rhythm, the full way throughout.
True, but these songs don't always last over 3 to 4 minutes in length.
 
Back
Top