Official Star Trek Thread

I recently read Flying Starships by Ronald B Moore (not to be confused with Ronald D Moore), he had various special effects credits on TNG, Voyager, and Enterprise. Pretty interesting book about what it took to do the effects on the show and the odd Hollywood union rules. Worth checking out if you are interested in this sort of thing
 
24634_553849287979888_204613811_n.jpg
 
Yeah, I saw it Wednesday, it was really good. I think I am going to see it again tomorrow. I am usually not a fan of 3D, but this looked really good in IMAX 3D
 
I wanna see it again myself. I was having mixed feelings towards the end, but then I loved it.
 
Probably give it a watch this weekend. Maybe today if we are just sticking around the house.
 
I wanna see it again myself. I was having mixed feelings towards the end, but then I loved it.
I was thinking about the end .. when I first saw it, I thought "sweet, this is awesome" especially when
Spock said Kahhhhhhhhhhhhhnnn

When I got home, I started thinking if that was a good idea or not, but ended up thinking my first reaction was what I am going with. It was a really fun movie.
 
That's the part I had mixed feelings about :) Part of me loved it, part of me thought "cheesy". But, my daughters loved it!
 
My kid bought the Star Trek movie blu ray sets (original and next generation movies). I am watching the extras on Star Trek 6, which are actually pretty interesting .. one section where a stage company produces Hamlet "in the original Klingon" is interesting :)
 
I saw Into Darkness last night. I had pretty low expectations, but I really liked it. As in, I really did. I smiled throughout the movie, cherishing the fact that they did manage to capture the Star Trek feel after all. It was a lot of fun, and the scene with
Kirk and Khan making the space jump had me on the edge of my seat. It was also resolved in a good way. I'm not sure how I feel about the ending, though. It was an interesting way to make up for the emotional trauma of Spock's death , but it was clear right away that it would be resolved with that tribble thing.[/quote]
 
As a long time Trekkie (original series), I thought Into Darkness was fantastic. Great action, continued character development, and a ton of old school references. Already pre-ordered the blu-ray...
 
With JJ leaving and taking his team of producers with him to work on Star Wars I don't know how they'll keep up with a 3rd installment of Star Trek. I loved both of the new movies JJ did and I trust him enough that he'll make far better movies than the prequels. The only negative is that he's so damn tight on letting out spoilers it's like digging for a gold mine to get something out of his movies while in production. And that sucks for me because I love spoilers, I love spoilers so much that whenever I read a new book I always read the last 2-3 pages first then start from the first page. I must know the outcome first then read it and see how it got to that outcome and the same with movies I love reading movie spoilers.
 
Enjoy Trekkies!

The Internet Archive rules! Complete, in colour, and in all formats you'd wish. All issues from 1976 until about 1995.
https://archive.org/details/starlogmagazine

Welcome to Starlog Magazine

Starlog was a monthly science-fiction film magazine published by Starlog Group Inc. The magazine was created by publishers Kerry O'Quinn and Norman Jacobs. O'Quinn was the magazine's editor while Jacobs ran the business side of things, dealing with typesetters, engravers and printers. They got their start in publishing creating a soap opera magazine. In the mid-1970s, O'Quinn and high school friend David Houston talked about creating a magazine that would cover science fiction films and television programs.

O'Quinn came up the idea of publishing a one-time only magazine on the Star Trek phenomenon. Houston's editorial assistant Kirsten Russell suggested that they include an episode guide to all three seasons of the show, interviews with the cast and previously unpublished photographs. During this brainstorming session many questions were raised, most notably legal issues. Houston contacted Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry with the intention of interviewing him for the magazine. Once they got his approval, O'Quinn and Jacobs proceeded to put together the magazine but Paramount Studios, who owned Star Trek, wanted a minimum royalty that was greater than their projected net receipts and the project was shelved. O'Quinn realized that they could create a magazine that only featured Star Trek content but without it being the focus and therefore getting around the royalties issue. He also realized that this could be the science fiction magazine he and Houston had talked about. Many titles for it were suggested, including Fantastic Films and Starflight before Starlog was chosen. (Fantastic Films was later used as the title of a competing science fiction magazine published by Blake Publishing.)

To keep costs down, Starlog was initially a quarterly magazine with the first issue being published on August 1976. The issue sold out and this encouraged O'Quinn and Jacobs to publish a magazine every six weeks instead of quarterly. O'Quinn was the magazine's first editor with Houston taking over for a year and then replaced by Howard Zimmerman when Houston was promoted to the "Hollywood Bureau." Zimmerman was eventually succeeded by David McDonnell.

One of the magazine's milestones was its 100th issue, published on November 1985 and featured who they thought were the 100 most important people in science fiction. This included exclusive interviews with John Carpenter, Peter Cushing, George Lucas, Leonard Nimoy, and Gene Roddenberry. The magazine's 200th issue repeated the format of the 100th issue but this time interviewed such notable artists as Arthur C. Clarke, Tim Burton, William Gibson, Gale Anne Hurd, and Terry Gilliam. Starlog was one of the first publications to report on the development of the first Star Wars movie, and it also followed the development of what was to eventually become Star Trek: The Motion Picture. The magazine was devoted to science fiction films, television series, and books. Many fans of this long-running magazine considered its heyday to have been the 1980s with very little substance to the content in later years and many of its long-time contributors having since moved on. But it continued to boast some top-flight genre journalists, including film historians Will Murray, Jean-Marc Lofficier and Tom Weaver. It was one of the longest-running and most popular publications of its type.

It published its 30th Anniversary issue in 2006. On Wednesday, December 5, 2007 at approximately 11 a.m. a warehouse, operated by Kable News, in Oregon, Illinois containing back issues of Starlog and Fangoria burned to the ground.
Thanks to Mike Maginnis for his contributions to this collection.
 
Very cool .. I used to subscribe to Starlog (yeah ... geek central) ... but it was a really cool magazne.
 
Nice to get through the Winter. ;-)

I am not so much into it as you guys, but I thought I had to share it here. I should surely check that 100th issue, at least.
 
Back
Top