Dr. Eddies Wingman
Brighter than thousand_suns
What I said was just plain and simple that Hiddink had started well (in his first two games) but that it was really nothing to get carried away over. Your post, which I responded to, was the following:
It's not amazing to climb two spots in two games and there is no reason to claim that they would carry on with that. This particular post seemed to imply that all in a sudden, Chelsea were the bookie's favourites to win the title. My response was that this hadn''t changed things around very much at all. That's not a disrespect to Chelsea, not to Hiddink and not to friggin' Holland. It is not disrespectful to anyone. And then Albie comes up with this:
I think that's not unfair when we're only talking about two fucking games. If Chelsea had been 10 points behind Villa, 12 behind Liverpool and then two months later had 8 wins in a row and was ahead of both - impressive form by Chelsea and bad collapse by Liverpool and Villa.
And who has said United's way to the top wasn't helped by a poor december by Liverpool? Of course it was. But it also included a quite long unbeaten run in the league including 13 games in a row without conceding a goal. Obviously United were going to get some credit for that.
And obviously Hiddink will get loads of credit if he manages to keep Chelsea in the current form for the rest of the season, it would be nothing short of impressive. But Forostar, don't get pissed off just because someone don't want to hand out that credit after two games.
Forostar said:Chelsea before Hiddink: place 4
Chelsea since Hiddink (only 2 Premier League matches): place 2
One to go.
Better start sweating!![]()
It's not amazing to climb two spots in two games and there is no reason to claim that they would carry on with that. This particular post seemed to imply that all in a sudden, Chelsea were the bookie's favourites to win the title. My response was that this hadn''t changed things around very much at all. That's not a disrespect to Chelsea, not to Hiddink and not to friggin' Holland. It is not disrespectful to anyone. And then Albie comes up with this:
Albie said:A more telling stat. The fact that Chelsea has climbed two places is more to do with the teams above 'em dropping points.
I think that's not unfair when we're only talking about two fucking games. If Chelsea had been 10 points behind Villa, 12 behind Liverpool and then two months later had 8 wins in a row and was ahead of both - impressive form by Chelsea and bad collapse by Liverpool and Villa.
And who has said United's way to the top wasn't helped by a poor december by Liverpool? Of course it was. But it also included a quite long unbeaten run in the league including 13 games in a row without conceding a goal. Obviously United were going to get some credit for that.
And obviously Hiddink will get loads of credit if he manages to keep Chelsea in the current form for the rest of the season, it would be nothing short of impressive. But Forostar, don't get pissed off just because someone don't want to hand out that credit after two games.