NOW READING

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
I'm currently reading a heavy book(around 5kg) called Leonardo Da Vinci by D.M.Field. It's from a British publisher(Grange), I think, and is a really luxurious edition. It has valuable information about Leonardo's life, art of his time,  and finally experts view on his art. It basically has his paintings, drawings, sketches... in it together with close up's of the important details. I really enjoy the autor's explanations of Leonardo's works, the circumstances in which some of them were made, the large scale preparations he undertook in order to make such realistic art. He actually made nude sketches of people he wanted to paint, in order to get the anatomy right.
Oh, what do you know, while I'm writing this a friend of mine who borrowed me the book, just came over saying he needs it back. Actually his ex girlfriend who owns it needs it back(relationships, ey). I must check the library tomorrow to see if they got it. ;)

Anyway, a great book imo. I recommend it to anyone who's interested in the topic.
Just remembered, I saw a 40 quid price on it. Art books are expensive.
 
Shadow said:
Been reading a lot of science fiction lately, most recently the first two volumes in Robert A. Heinlein's majestic Future History series - The Man Who Sold the Moon and The Green Hills of Earth. The series consists of a number of short stories dealing with various scientific advances, the development of space travel, colonization of the moon and all the rest and is, on the whole, very good. The series doesn't flow perfectly and the stories don't read as a linear plotline, so there's a lot of blanks you have to fill in yourself and, naturally, the stories vary in quality (from classics like "The Roads Must Roll", "The Man Who Sold the Moon", "It's Great to be Back" and "Logic of Empire" to decidedly lesser works like "Space Jockey") but it's a marvellous reading experience nevertheless. Heinlein is undoubtely one of the finest science fiction writers of all time, if not THE finest.

Right now I'm reading The Martian Way and Other Stories by Isaac Asimov, which is a very old volume I picked up for $3 in a second-hand bookshop in San Francisco. After that I think I'll read something not science fiction.

If I were you I would carry on reading science-fiction for a while and give a try to Cordwainer Smith who wrote is own history of future called The Rediscovery of Mankind. Smith's stories describe a long future history from a postapocalyptic era to a state of utopia, in which Earth is ruled by the Instrumentality of Mankind. Smith' style is quite unusual (according to the standards of science-fiction) and sometimes it's closer to poetry.
 
syl said:
If I were you I would carry on reading science-fiction for a while and give a try to Cordwainer Smith who wrote is own history of future called The Rediscovery of Mankind. Smith's stories describe a long future history from a postapocalyptic era to a state of utopia, in which Earth is ruled by the Instrumentality of Mankind. Smith' style is quite unusual (according to the standards of science-fiction) and sometimes it's closer to poetry.

I've read one story of his - "Scanners Live in Vain" - which I found quite good. Thanks for the recommendation!

Regarding my promise to read something not science fiction, I'm blowing it right away (and will probably continue to do so). I'm currently reading an anthology of classic robot stories, edited by Sam J. Lundwall who is perhaps Sweden's most prominent SF writer (I have read nothing by him). Like all collections of this kind the stories vary in quality, but overall it's an unusually good one (I still have about a fourth of the stories left).

Highlights include Karel Capek's "R.U.R." - which for people unfamiliar with it is the play that introduced the word "robot" to the world's languages - Alfred Bester wonderful "Fondly Fahrenheit" - a story I liked much better now that I read it a second time and had a grip of the rather unusual narrative structure* - Frederik Pohl's "The Tunnel Under the World", Robert Silverberg's rather scary "The Iron Chancellor" - which is like an episode of "You Are What You Eat" taken to the next level - James White's simultaneously sad and happy "Second Ending" - in which a man is awakened from suspended animation after the Earth and all its life has perished in a nuclear war and together with a team of robots attempt to revive the planet - and Philip K. Dick's "The Electric Ant" - which explores his usual theme that everything is about perception and nothing is objective.

I was not overly pleased with the choice of "Liar!" to represent Isaac Asimov - it's a very good story alright but not at all one of his best, but that's a minor complaint.

* "Fondly Fahrenheit" is the story of a rich kid called Vandaleur and his expensive android who have become two aspects of one insane personality, and therefore the story constantly shifts viewpoint between third person, first person Vandaleur, first person android and first person plural. First time you read it it's quite confusing, but once you get a grip on it it's a brilliant story.
 
Shadow said:
Highlights include Karel Capek's "R.U.R." - which for people unfamiliar with it is the play that introduced the word "robot" to the world's languages -

Great play! I loved it. But I kept thinking that what to Capek were "robots" to us they are now known as "humanoids, androids or cyborgs." Robots to us are entirely mechanical, but to Capek they resembled humans (at least the later versions) and they later even become human (there's a Japanese anime whose name I can't remember that takes this story-line as well).
 
Well, the word "robot" comes from the Czech word "robota" meaning simply "forced labour", so it has no real connection with what the robots are made of. Capek allegedly got the idea for the play when he sat in the car reading the newspaper, and when suddenly looking up, he thought the people around looked like artificial creatures.
 
Yeah, I read "Thus Spoke Zarathustra". It was one of the most boring books I've ever read and I didn't keep much of it, to be honest.
 
Perun said:
Yeah, I read "Thus Spoke Zarathustra". It was one of the most boring books I've ever read and I didn't keep much of it, to be honest.

I'm surprised to hear this from you Perun. Nietchze is probably the most original thinker of the 20th century and is IMO the most misunderstood. But Thus Spaketh Zarathustra is a briliant book. I loved it, and to this day I live by some of the sayings in that book. I need to reread it actually.
 
Actually, I'm quite familiar with Nietzsche's works, and I do agree with some of his points.

But the book was just damn boring to read.
 
I've been reading Hesse's Siddhartha recently. It's a good read, and it doesn't take a long time to finish (its not even 200 pages long), but it is thought-provoking and beautifully written. Since it's Hesse, I would recommend that you read it in German, but if you don't speak German, well, I suppose English will have to do. :blush:
 
I read Damien by Hesse in Spanish :D talk about a Nietzche disciple lol. Very good books indeed, though I'm afraid he's a little confused, but I don't blame him hahaha.
 
I'm desperately trying to get through "Want to Play?" by P J Tracy, but I'm struggling slightly. I'm only on chapter 16 and I've met about 15 different detectives covering smoothing like 7 homicides!

But I'll stick with it! I'll review it upon completion....soon!
 
SinisterMinisterX said:
Next up: Jacquez Barzun, From Dawn To Decadence: 500 Years Of Western Cultural Life, 1500 To The Present
I can already tell that this one looks like a steaming load. It starts with the Protestant Reformation, but it only takes a few pages before the author drops this turd:
"Dozens of cults have latterly arisen in the Christian West: Buddhism, Islam, Yoga, Transcendental Meditation, Dr. Moon's Unification Church..."
Buddhism is 1400 years old and Islam 800. Those are religions, not cults, and are observed by hundreds of millions. Lumping them in with the Moonies displays extraordinary ignorance. "New" to the West or not, they deserve more respect. Nor is Yoga or TM a cult. I understand the author is writing about mainstream Western culture, which inevitably means a Christian culture - but that doesn't mean he is right to treat other cultures like dirt.

Meh, I'll read the book anyway. Maybe the author just starts out by putting his foot in his mouth, and it gets better.

You've apparently already figured this out, but Dawn to Decadence is a disappointment: broad, but shallow, summary of Western culture.  A very ambitious work, I found it very dry, and I gave up trying to read it from start to finish.  Not bad as an occasional reference work, however. 

I will second SMX's recommendation of Battle Cry of Freedom.  It is excellent, and probably the best one-volume work of the American Civil War available.  It is often criticized as being biased in favor of the North, but I thought it was relatively balanced.  Anyone interested in the topic of slavery might be interested to read Time On The Cross by Robert Fogel and Stanley Engelmann.  It is a scholarly economic text by Nobel-prize-winning economists who argue that, contrary to what many assumed at the time of publication (mid-1970s), American slavery was (generally speaking) economically efficient and living conditions of slaves in the South were often better than those of free blacks in the North.  The book is misunderstood by many as an endorsement of slavery, but that could not be farther from the truth.  Fogel's premise is that slavery was not doomed to fail for economic reasons, but rather was doomed to fail because, at some point, most Americans came to the inevitable conclusion that the moral case against slavery was far stronger than the economic case for it.  In some ways this is, of course, inconsistent with the excerpts from Battle Cry of Freedom identified by SMX, though I suppose one conclusion is that people could be opposed to slavery, on principle, yet still be racist.  For fans of fiction and the Civil War, I recommend The March by E.L. Doctorow (a recent fictionalized account of Sherman's March to the Sea) and Beloved by Toni Morrison (a ghost story -- that's a gross oversimplification -- about a family of freed slaves; it was recently selected in a New York Times survey as the best work of American fiction in the past 25 years). 

Unrelated to the Civil War, I cannot recommend strongly enough Cormac McCarthy's new book, The Road.  I would recommend it to anyone, but fans of Iron Maiden may be more likely than the average reader to appreciate McCarthy's worldview.  I don't want to say too much and spoil it, but it is about a father and son trying to survive in a post-apocalyptic world in which virtually all life has been destroyed, but for a very few humans who are either cannibals or people trying to avoid being eaten.  Very different in setting from his earlier works, but similar in tone.  McCarthy is, in my humble view, the greatest living American writer, and he has been compared by scholars far more well-read than me to Faulkner, Hemingway and Melville.  Go get it.  No, I get no money from sales of his books. 
 
Albie said:
I'm desperately trying to get through "Want to Play?" by P J Tracy
Right well, I finished this book today. Not a bad book, but the initial few chapters seemed to contain so many characters - mostly detectives - and it seemed to dull it slightly.

But once you pass that initial stage, what we have is a double homicide in a rural town in Wisconsin and two separate murders in Minneapolis. The story flits between the two seemingly as separate entities. The double homicide of a wealthy elderly and deeply religious (to the point of been unhealthy) couple in Wisconsin seem to be the work of a psychopath - possibly out for revenge. The murders that take place in Minneapolis, however, are copy-cat killings from a new on-line demo game called SKUD (Serial Killer, Undercover Detective). The two follow different paths until they strike common ground - at which point we have the two police departments working together to try and stop the spate of killings as we get to killing number four (a further two more happened after the game creators - a small business of 5 equal partners - gave the police clear indication that they follow the same pattern as the game) of a possible 17. Slowly, things start to fall in place. Needless to say, as the investigation crosses state borders, the Fed's stick their oar in - only after they have been sniffing around a small bit of forensic that was presented to them by sheer coincidence that related to an ongoing investigation. But they get the cold shoulder, as always, and are kept "out of the loop". Well, the main character is a Minneapolis cop, so the Fed's could never take over, could they?

All in all, if you like the thriller type novels, it is worthy of a read.
 
Well, I've just read "Run for Cover: the Art of Derek Riggs". It's quite interesting to get a behind-the-arts insight into the life, methods, and problems of the guy who created Eddie.
 
Right, I am in the middle of reading "The Righteous Men" by Sam Bourne. (Sam Bourne is a pseudonym for the English Journolist Jonathan Freedman).

This is quite the "Da Vinci Code" type novel but more centered on a Jewish Sect (rather than Catholic - Freedman is a Jew after all). So far so good, with this novel. The gist is that good people across the globe are been killed (albeit one of the the dead is a drug baron in Haiti, but he did try to give to the poor; a modern day Robin Hood if you will, though he certainly took his cut) and a "rookie" Journo for the "New York Times" has had his wife kidnapped (quite possibly by a Hassidic [as it is spelt] Community in New York) - but why?

I'll post my thoughts upon completion!
 
Recently, I read Naked Lunch by William Seward Burroughs, the novel on which his reputation as a writer solely rests upon.  Written in a hotel room in Tangier, Morrocco between 1954 and 1957 and published in the U.S. in 1962, it caused great controversey with its explicit depictions of drug use and sexual abuse. Much of this novel largely eschews any traditional form of storytelling and embraces a far more experimental style. The much-touted "cut-up" technique--mirrored the workings of a junkie's brain as he narrated the addict's monumental descent into hell, as he travels from New York to Tangiers, and then into the Interzone. There he finds a nightmarish modern urban wasteland in which the forces of evil vie for control of the individual and all of humanity. Burroughs sees addiction as part of the global conspiracy by the presiding powers of our world. How does Burroughs explode this conspiracy? By inviting us to lunch.

While many would like to put William S. Burroughs down as nothing more than a junkie who killed his own wife and whose writing is very overrated, there is simply such power in his words that cannot be denied. The captivating writing style and the amazingly hilarious black humor that abounds throught the book come straight off every page. Those easily outraged by the more lurid content of the book are missing the point as Burroughs pulls no punches describing a junkie's world and what goes on within his mind whether it's real, imagined or while in a narcotic stupor. The concept of dehumanization cannot be ignored by anyone who lives, and in pieced-part what the book may be about. The book takes egocentric forms of fantasy, adventursome, vision, experience, rebellion, terror & sabotage on a universal scale beyond peaks of mere interest and just might make you look at everything including prehistoric events differently. Recommended for fans of Bret Easton Ellis and Chuck Palahniuk.
 
Well, right now I'm reading the 5th installment in Frank Herbert's Dune saga. It's called Heretics of Dune and is still, just like the other books, an insightful book about the powers of religion and manipulation. Next on my list is the last of the original books, Chapter House Dune. Then I've gone through the entire series (again). A big thank you to AdLibris, www.adlibris.se, for their fair pricing on paper backs :ok:

After Dune, I'm seriously considering buying Asimov's Foundation series, but there are so many books in that series it's hard to know where to start sometimes. I've read them before, but I don't own them...and I'm still waiting for the next part of the Wheel of time-series, as well as George R R Martin's next book. The curse of being a fantasy buff is that all books that are written are a part of a 6-15-part series which makes you wait 1-2 years between the books :mad:
 
Anomica said:
After Dune, I'm seriously considering buying Asimov's Foundation series, but there are so many books in that series it's hard to know where to start sometimes.

Start with the original trilogy - Foundation, Foundation and Empire and Second Foundation (available in Swedish all rolled into one neat paperback volume). That's basically the original nine short stories from the 40s and 50s, and easily the best volumes in the series.

In the 80s and 90s Asimov picked up the thread again and wrote two sequels - Foundation's Edge (great, but not as good the original ones) and Foundation and Earth (haven't read it yet) - and two prequels - Prelude to Foundation (alright) and Forward the Foundation (haven't read). If you like the original ones they're worth reading but if you don't want to read/own all of them then go for the classics.

I owe a lot to this series for introducing me to science fiction a few years ago... the original trilogy still ranks among my favourite books of all time.
 
Shadow said:
Start with the original trilogy - Foundation, Foundation and Empire and Second Foundation (available in Swedish all rolled into one neat paperback volume). That's basically the original nine short stories from the 40s and 50s, and easily the best volumes in the series.

In the 80s and 90s Asimov picked up the thread again and wrote two sequels - Foundation's Edge (great, but not as good the original ones) and Foundation and Earth (haven't read it yet) - and two prequels - Prelude to Foundation (alright) and Forward the Foundation (haven't read). If you like the original ones they're worth reading but if you don't want to read/own all of them then go for the classics.

I owe a lot to this series for introducing me to science fiction a few years ago... the original trilogy still ranks among my favourite books of all time.
Thanks Shadow. Maybe I wasn't clear. I read the whole series a couple of times and I agree, the original trilogy is the best of the lot. There is one book you forgot, Hari Seldon and the Foundation, which is Asimov's last book. They pretty much introduced me too to sci-fi, "many moons ago", together with Heinlein's adventure books (Have spacesuit - will travel, Glory Road and Tunnel in the sky). Another pretty interesting, modern, sf-writer is Greg Bear. If you haven't read his books, I can recommend Eon and Anvil of stars as really good "reads".
Speaking of SF - don't forget Arthur C Clarke. Clarke's Rama-series in particular, but he's written a host of brilliant SF over the years.
 
Back
Top