Yeah, 0 is worth it for $5. But while it’s visually superb, it doesn’t stack up to the remake. I’d be curious as to your thoughts after you play them both.
When I get around to it, should I play 0 first, or would it be a better experience if I played 1 first, then 0?
Finished up
Trek To Yomi, which probably wound up being about 6-7 hours long. I guess there are three different endings, but I don’t plan to replay the game to see them, since I imagine they only differ by a little dialogue and a cut scene or two.
I played the game on the medium difficulty, since the default lowest difficulty described itself as being for people who “just want to enjoy the story”, and for the most part I think I made the right choice; but the final boss sent me into a
Dark-Souls-level rage with how annoying he was. I did finally beat him after about 10-15 tries, though.
The 2D swordfighting combat was kind of interesting, but I never felt like I fully understood it or fully mastered it. Parries only seemed to be about 80% successful, and some attacks that seemed like they should have worked would wind up failing; but I did get noticeably better over time and felt at least mostly in control.
The game had a cool visual style and was pretty memorable, and I was happy to play it as a free PS+ title, but I couldn’t imagine paying more than $10 for it.
I think I’m going to play through
The Last Of Us Remastered and
The Last Of Us Part II as my next major undertaking. I haven’t played the first game since its original PS3 release, and I think it was only 10-12 hours long, so I figured a replay was warranted before hitting the sequel for the first time. I also wanted to replay the game while the TV adaptation was still fresh in my mind, and finish the sequel before the second season comes around.