@Diesel 11 English isn't my native language, so that may be it, but I really lack words how to describe your overall Metallica ratings.
@Collin I agree with most of your points: Death Magnetic = Yay, Hardwired = Nay!
@Number 6 I've also tried to listen to Lulu several times, but I just coulnd't force myself to listen to the whole thing. However, I believe there are people who like that album, or hold it in high regards. What puzzles me is the how can somebody make great differences between very similar albums? I mean, if you put those numbers in a graph, it would look like a mess.
@CriedWhenBrucieLeft One answer to your question: Marketing. Also having a No 1 hit also helps. I think their singles combo from Black album did most of the word: Enter Sandman, The Unforgiven, Nothing Else Matters. Those were album sellers and put Black album on pedestal. After you spend some time up top, it's pretty hard to ignore you. Also, I think
@Jer had a good point in this thread about Metallica selling out. Not only they scooped the cream from metal audiences but Black and later Load/ReLoad made them go into rock territory more, expanding their audiences.
Considering
Hardwired album, I was also disappointed. I ran it once again few days ago and it's a bit better, but to me, that's the "safest" album they ever made. And saying "They don't have to prove anybody anything" doesn't say a thing about album. If you're talking about band in general, then yes, you can use that phrase, but not to describe an album. If they don't have to prove anybody anything, than they just wouldn't publish at all.
The song
Hardwired itself, I get. It was meant for younger audiences definitely, simplistic, put a curse word, make it fast - I don't like it that much, but it kinda makes sense.
Atlas, Rise came after that I think, and I like that one. It has more
Death Magnetic feel. There's a lot going on there and I usually don't mind complicating things but I have a feeling I would like it more if they cut a cymbal or two here or there or a certain riff. Or maybe change the speed. I don't know, its kinda stop-n-go at moment.
Moth into the Flame was the third single if I'm correct and I really like that one. Same can't be said for
Now That We're Dead - after really cool intro, song just doesn't go anywhere. Now, when the album came out, most commonly spoken songs (in positive way) were
Dream No More and
Halo on Fire. Dream No More I didn't like at first, but really is now one of the highlights on the album, it really shows something doesn't have to be fast or complicated to make it heavy. If this was approach on Load/ReLoad maybe I would like them more. Then again, it's been years, if not a decade since I last heard those two albums, so maybe I need to listen them again.
And I don't get all the praise for
Halo on Fire. First part is great, but... BUT! It's a 8 min Metallica song that starts slowly yet atmospheric, I can hear/feel things change around 6th minute and than... Nothing. I expected a fireworks a-la
One or even Day that Never Comes but I got "
Hello darkness, say goodbye". Goodbye James, you and your snoozefest at the end.
I don't remember 2nd disc that much. Only
Murder One (but only because of the cool video, song is rubbish) and
Spit Out the Bone which sounds like it warped from late 80's and I love it.
And that's the thing with this album. I don't remember a single critic or review said: "This sucks" because no matter which kind of Metallica period you like, you're gone find something here that's right up your alley: Early 80's, Justice, Black, 90's, Death Magnetic - it's all there, but in a bits. And that's kind of thumb down to me.