Let's try and get 1,000,000 replies to this post

I can understand why people don't like LotR, the books, and might prefer the films. They're condensed and tell generally the same story as the books in a pleasing package. The books are a commitment that takes effort to enjoy.
 
LotR books > LotR films > Harry Potter films > Harry Potter books > Narnia books > Narnia films

The only reason I'm putting Harry Potter films ahead of Harry Potter books is the presence of one Emma Watson.
 
Harry Potter books > LOTR films > LOTR books > Harry Potter films > Narnia books. Haven't seen any of the Narnia films, read 2 books.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrK
LotR books > Harry Potter books >>> LotR movies > HP movies > anything Narnia.

Haven't read Narnia books since childhood, but I don't recall especially loving them. I got through them. I also first read Hobbit/LotR at that age too, but those inspired yearly re-reads.

"LotR movies" means LotR. Not Hobbit. I only left Hobbit off the list because I've never seen a complete Narnia movie, so I can't compare... but Hobbit movies are in the same area, I think.
 
SinisterMinisterX said:
"LotR movies" means LotR. Not Hobbit. I only left Hobbit off the list because I've never seen a complete Narnia movie, so I can't compare... but Hobbit movies are in the same area, I think.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'd say the Narnia movies are slightly better than the Hobbit films.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top