Let's try and get 1,000,000 replies to this post

Had an exam at uni this morning, subject "History of Serbian political thought". Only read the shortened 15 page version while waiting for the bus to get to uni and did the test in 5 minutes. Just got the result and I passed :yey::nana:
 
A short affair. How much on Milosevic?
Nothing :D It basically consists of biographies/thoughts of about 15 politicians, all of them active before WWI.

Also we don't have lessons about the 90's-present at all. We study stuff up until Tito's death in 1980 and rarely anything after (when it comes to Serbia, that is). I asked one of the assistant professors about that and he said that they try to incorporate some of that stuff but it always ends up in shouting and arguing between students and professors.

I never had a single lesson about the 90's war in elementary or high school or uni.
 
Nothing :D It basically consists of biographies/thoughts of about 15 politicians, all of them active before WWI.

Also we don't have lessons about the 90's-present at all. We study stuff up until Tito's death in 1980 and rarely anything after (when it comes to Serbia, that is). I asked one of the assistant professors about that and he said that they try to incorporate some of that stuff but it always ends up in shouting and arguing between students and professors.

I never had a single lesson about the 90's war in elementary or high school or uni.
I sort of expected that already, but still that's really bad. I hope the darker past will get attention as well at some point. They should call it: "History of Serbian political thought until 1980".
 
Give them time, Foro. You don't just turn into a democracy overnight, and you don't just develop an official stance to teach within a few years.
 
An official stance might indeed be complicated when people don't admit certain things have happened. But to simply do nothing with it... Perhaps in 2025 or 2030, a new beginning, who knows.
 
Look at it this way: Serbia needs to educate a generation in democracy as a country that has never had democracy before. How do you suggest they go about it?
 
An official stance might indeed be complicated when people don't admit certain things have happened.
Yep. I'm pretty sure that there will always be "patriots" who will claim that we did nothing wrong and that the Croats and Bosnian Muslims did all the bad stuff.
 
This is not just something Serbia has to go through. It's quite the same here as well - no mention of the years after 1989 in our history classes. It's still to early to draw conclusions on our own post-Communist years, probably because we're still having basically the same generation of politicians, historians, sociologists, etc. Things are very vague. I guess in Serbia and other former Yugoslav republics things are even more complicated by other factors.
 
In order to prevent to have another "know-nothing of 1980-2010"generation, I wouldn't wait too long with teaching history in a proper manner. But what is proper? It's complicated indeed when people in power change or omit facts.

How to educate in democracy? Wow... Well, let's hope the EU can give assistance. Take a look at some countries with democracy.
 
Yeah, the problem with that, Foro, is someone can't come in from outside the country and give a list of "how to be a democracy". That's how America does it, and it hasn't been successful. Serbia, and all the other former Soviet states, have to find their own way. Help can be offered, but not forced.
 
Guys, our democracy is not entirely the democracy you know. Keep that in mind.
My Russian studies professor talked a lot about this, about how post-Soviet democracies are completely different from western democracies. Different expectations, different functions, different concepts of freedoms.
 
Meanwhile, I can only advice young Serbs like Night Prowler to look beyond their borders if they want to learn about a period their own education is silent about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top