D
Deleted member 7164
Guest
Was this person born in United States?
Historical Figures 20 Questions
- Thread starter LooseCannon
- Start date
LooseCannon said:
3. Yes, this person is dead.
Zare said:
4. Yes, this person was born in the United States.
SinisterMinisterX said:
Excellent, that's 6.6 billion ruled out. Was this person an artist?
5. No, this person was not an artist.
Was this person primarily known to history as a politician?
6. No, this person was not a politician.
Was this person a scientist?
7. No, this person was not a scientist.
Was this person's prime contribution to history religious?
8. No, this person was not a religious figure.
I already asked, Per.
9. This person died of lung cancer after decades of pack-a-day smoking.
Freebie: I would have considered acting to be an art. If this person was an actor, I'd have said 'yes' to artist.
So... no, not an actor.
So... no, not an actor.
Ok, so a US person, born after 1850, dead from smoking a pack a day. Not a politician, religious figure, actor or scientist. Was this person known, historically, as a business-person?
national acrobat
Ancient Mariner
I was thinking of one.SinisterMinisterX said:
0<250 AD, Roman, primarily non-political....I just went after the most obvious one. Don't forget, if I had an area of historical expertise the Roman empire would be it.LooseCannon said:
national acrobat said:
How am I supposed to know that! The only thing I ever see you doing is being the ugly one in pictures with Perun!
Wasted155 said:
10. No, this person was not known for business activities.
(Meaning: this person was involved in business, but was never famous for that. There was something much more famous before the business.)
LooseCannon said:The only thing I ever see you doing is being the ugly one in pictures with Perun!
Wow. That's some serious ugly, if you can surpass Perun in that regard.