Cosmiceddie
Back From The Edge
I'm beginning to believe that Hell On Earth is obviously overrated.
I've been watching this guy's reviews of Maiden for quite a while now.
It isn't, you should, and it does.Steve hits a double homer! Is that a thing? I don't know, I don't care. This song slays.
Totally agree with you. The four perfect songs with which Maiden could end its career could be "Rime Of The Ancient Mariner", "Journeyman", "The Legacy" or "When The Wild Wind Blows".An emotional album closer. Great song.
This view may now be a bit redundant now we know that this album likely *wont* be the final album (Bruce revealed that the band were thinking of recording a second album before common sense dictated that they should release the album they already had recorded) however some have commented that this would be a fine song on which to end Maiden's recording career on.
I have to respectibly but thoroughly disagree on that one. Musically, it's quite apt but lyrically not so.
Maiden's career is one of absolute success, a testament to sincerity and integrity, and ultimately a force for overwhelming positivity. So a good song to be the end of such a career would, I feel, need to be cerebral and uplifting, maybe introspective. The Thin Line Between Love And Hate and the Journeyman would be atypical of what I am thinking along the lines of.
Lyrically, you could argue that Harris is somewhat on a debbie downer on this song - and that would not be a befitting way to mark the end of this bands recording career.
Brilliant song, still.
+1. One of the all time best choruses of Maiden! A really strange decision by Steve - every other song in the album has a repeated chorus at least twice, but ''Hell On Earth'' not... actually, I think the outro works great for the song (heading calmly to the horizon and you immediately want to hear this emotional song again), but at least one more repetition before it was totally necessary. Btw, the intro is quite long, but it's pure gold imo.What a great chorus. Why on earth (‘scuse the pun) didn’t they repeat it?!
Spot on about the chorus. Even the part ''Love in anger, Life in danger'' is repeated twice, which can be viewed as an additional chorus, I suppose. The song is very ''rich'' and interesting, but I will always wonder why Steve has made such a decision.Why do we only get on run of the chorus? It's so good that it should get at least one more spin through!
The momentum of the song screeches to a halt when we break into the instrumental section. Should've just kept flying.
"You dance on the graves who bled for us"... This section feels ham-fisted, like Bruce is being forced to choke out the lines before the timer is up. Then it jumps right into an unrelated section with a way slower place that feels kind of unnatural.
Not having another go at the chorus means that the ending feels premature. And the outro is too long.
And if I was Steve I'd have gone full Angel and the Gambler on this chorus. It's too good not to.I think if I was Steve I'd have tied the second chorus into the outro. Slow it down, back it only by the bass, quiet guitar, and keys, and have a softer Bruce sing over it before flowing into the outro as we know it.
I appreciate what you're saying here but for me the opposite happens. I often lack the patience to sit through the second half of the song, because I've had the good bits already. It peaks too early.I'm not explaining my view very well, but I think Hell on Earth is just more magical with that "chorus" having just one go. It's rewarding, but it also makes the latter half of the song have a life of it's own and leaving that hunger & desire to revisit the album (or just the song) quite soon, where as sometimes this kind of albums & songs might feel slightly too "overwhelming" for an instant re-listen. For me, anyways!
It might work pretty well (like the calm middle part), but I think the chorus should be the same. It's too good to have any changes.I think if I was Steve I'd have tied the second chorus into the outro. Slow it down, back it only by the bass, quiet guitar, and keys, and have a softer Bruce sing over it before flowing into the outro as we know it.
You are right about the hunger, but I think such glorious parts should be repeated at least twice in a song. And we are talking about an epic, not a short song - it's almost necessary. For example, ''Days Of Future Past'' has a lot of repetitions of the chorus for its 4 minutes, but it's great because the chorus is also amazing.I love that. As much as I love quite a lot of those "repetitive" songs from their catalogue, I also appreciate when a catchy chorus or whatever hook in the song has isn't "beaten to death" - as enjoyable as it might be.
I appreciate what you're saying here but for me the opposite happens. I often lack the patience to sit through the second half of the song, because I've had the good bits already. It peaks too early.