@JudasMyGuide honestly, thank you for speaking your mind on the whole Dead issue. His life is among the most tragic in music history, and I hate Euronymous's treatment of him like some beat dog as a mascot for them. It also frustrates me that his death was used as a cheap gag by the Warmaster Records to sell a bootleg live show that never should have come out.
But I do like the Deathcrush EP, which was released before Euronymous became as evil as he did. I think the dark atmosphere on it is unparalleled and it's a cool experience. But I also don't have any plans to vote for Mayhem in this game because of Euronymous's really reprehensible actions. Should I end up voting for them, it'll be solely in memoriam of Dead and what he could have been were he actually given the right support.
Hope that makes sense?
I thought we were voting music not history or personal beliefs.
This is ... wrong/incorrect on a lot of levels (it's nice to see you absolutely know why I do what I do, better than myself, actually), but okay, yes, Christians stress death and dying a lot. Possibly too much in cotrast with the current world which tries to pretend death doesn't exist at all or at least it's something you don't talk about.
On the other hand, to enjoy, use and in some ways support the mental illness of your bandmate, who suffers from self harm and does weird macabre shit, leave him alone and secluded with access to weapons for him to commit suicide and then collect pieces of his body and photograph him in order to increase your popularity and fandom via the resulting shock value when you put that on the cover of your shitty, shitty sounding, garbled attempt at noise-making, that's not something just Christians should be opposed to. In a f*** civilized society. Seriously???
Euronymous, if you ask me, was a bloody idiot, and you must not forget that much of the Norwegian BM scene was spoiled bored youngsters with too much time on their hands.Yes, but wouldn't you agree that maybe Mayhem crossed the line a bit, in intertwining their personal horrible selves with the music at hand? That is, in an attempt to create "evil" music they fell into and tried to sell their own evil as well?
(not an attack, this was my point all the time)
I know you like the music and that you probably take this as an attack at you, it's not (or at least it's not supposed to be). Just... even if I liked their sound (and while I am able to appreciate the genre, I can't this particular band) I couldn't listen to them, really. Maybe I'm just way too soft or something.
Though you also deserve some mocking for liking the constipated-man-trying-to-relieve-himself sound of Attila Csihár.
Agreed, Awake along with Images And Words are the two Dream Theater albums which I really want to revisit, because I have a fair bit of their songs on my playlist and they are all amazing but haven't heard them in the album context since the initial listen. Plus finding them on vinyl is damn near impossible.And it doesn’t have to be that way. Awake is a great album on its own merits. Well written, well performed, very well produced. It’s extremely dynamic: light moments like Lifting Shadows and the Rush-esque Innocence Faded mixed with very heavy material such as The Mirror. It’s probably their most “metal” album and, although challenging at times, is a lot more to the point and accessible in the same way.
Firepower is the ultimate “not bad” album. As in, it’s so bland that it’s hard to have any strong feelings for it one way or the other. If a sine wave could be translated to Metal music, this is what it would sound like.
The album gets the high praise rightfully so.Firepower is the most overrated album ever on MaidenFans.
Nostradamus slays it.
Yes, I think that's completely fine. I'm not an arbiter of that, I know, but I felt the immediate urge to like that post.
Yes, but wouldn't you agree that maybe Mayhem crossed the line a bit, in intertwining their personal horrible selves with the music at hand? That is, in an attempt to create "evil" music they fell into and tried to sell their own evil as well?
(not an attack, this was my point all the time)
I know you like the music and that you probably take this as an attack at you, it's not (or at least it's not supposed to be). Just... even if I liked their sound (and while I am able to appreciate the genre, I can't this particular band) I couldn't listen to them, really. Maybe I'm just way too soft or something.
Though you also deserve some mocking for liking the constipated-man-trying-to-relieve-himself sound of Attila Csihár.
Euronymous, if you ask me, was a bloody idiot, and you must not forget that much of the Norwegian BM scene was spoiled bored youngsters with too much time on their hands.
Which doesn't change the fact that all of a sudden they created something remarkable out of nothing.
As for Attila, it must be something Central European obviously after all, because I hear nothing wrong with his vocals.
A young man named Hieronymus strides through Richard Strauss’s hometown of Munich, scowling at the extravagance around him. He goes inside an art shop and berates its owner for displaying kitsch—art that is merely “beautiful” and therefore worthless. “Do you think gaudy colors can gloss over the misery of the world?” Hieronymus shouts. “Do you think loud orgies of luxurious good taste can drown the moans of the tortured earth? ... Art is the sacred torch that must shed its merciful light into all life’s terrible depths, into every shameful and sorrowful abyss; art is the divine flame that must set fire to the world, until the world with all its infamy and anguish burns and melts away in redeeming compassion!”
All over fin-de-siècle Europe, strange young men were tramping up narrow stairs to garret rooms and opening doors to secret places. Occult and mystical societies—Theosophist, Rosicrucian, Swedenborgian, kabbalistic, and neopagan—promised rupture from the world of the present. In the political sphere, Communists, anarchists, and ultra-nationalists plotted from various angles to overthrow the quasi-liberal monarchies of Europe; Leon Trotsky, in exile in Vienna from 1907 to 1914, began publishing a paper called Pravda. In the nascent field of psychology, Freud placed the ego at the mercy of the id. The world was unstable, and it seemed that one colossal Idea, or, failing that, one well-placed bomb, could bring it tumbling down. There was an almost titillating sense of imminent catastrophe.
Vienna was the scene of what may have been the ultimate pitched battle between the bourgeoisie and the avant-garde. A minority of “truth-seekers,” as the historian Carl Schorske calls them, or “critical modernists,” in the parlance of the philosopher Allan Janik, grew incensed by the city’s rampant aestheticism, its habit of covering all available surfaces in gold leaf. They saw before them a supposedly modern, liberal, tolerant society that was failing to deliver on its promises, that was consigning large parts of its citizenry to poverty and misery. They spoke up for the outcasts and the scapegoats, the homosexuals and the prostitutes. Many of the “truth-seekers” were Jewish, and they were beginning to comprehend that Jews could never assimilate themselves into an anti- Semitic society, no matter how great their devotion to German culture. In the face of the gigantic lie of the cult of beauty—so the rhetoric went—art had to become negative, critical. It had to differentiate itself from the pluralism of bourgeois culture, which, as Salome demonstrated, had acquired its own avant- garde division.
The offensive against kitsch moved on all fronts. The critic Karl Kraus used his one-man periodical, Die Fackel, or The Torch, to expose what he considered to be laziness and mendacity in journalistic language, institutionalized iniquity in the prosecution of crime, and hypocrisy in the work of popular artists. The architect Adolf Loos attacked the Art Nouveau compulsion to cover everyday objects in wasteful ornament, and, in 1911, shocked the city and the emperor with the unadorned, semi-industrial facade of his commercial building on the Michaelerplatz. The gruesome pictures of Oskar Kokoschka and Egon Schiele confronted a soft-porn art world with the insatiability of lust and the violence of sex. Georg Trakl’s poetry meticulously documented the onset of insanity and suicidal despair: “Now with my murderer I am alone.”
If members of this informal circle sometimes failed to appreciate one another’s work—the bohemian poet Peter Altenberg preferred Puccini and Strauss to Schoenberg and his students—they closed ranks when philistines attacked. There would be no backing down in the face of opposition. “If I must choose the lesser of two evils,” Kraus said, “I will choose neither.”
The most aggressive of Vienna’s truth-seekers was the philosopher Otto Weininger, who, in 1903, at the age of twenty-three, shot himself in the house where Beethoven died. In a city that considered suicide an art, Weininger’s was a masterpiece, and it made a posthumous bestseller of his doctoral dissertation, a bizarre tract titled Sex and Character. The argument of the book was that Europe suffered from racial, sexual, and ethical degeneration, whose root cause was the rampant sexuality of Woman. Jewishness and homosexuality were both symptoms of a feminized, aestheticized society. Only a masculine Genius could redeem the world. Wagner was “the greatest man since Christ.” Strange as it may seem in retrospect, this alternately incoherent and bigoted work attracted readers as intelligent as Kraus, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and James Joyce, not to mention Schoenberg and his pupils. The young Alban Berg devoured Weininger’s writings on culture, underlining sentences such as this: “Everything purely aesthetic has no cultural value.” Wittgenstein, who made it his mission to expunge pseudo-religious cant from philosophy, was quoting Weininger when he issued his aphorism “Ethics and aesthetics are one.”
The entire discourse surrounding the Viennese avant-garde demands skeptical scrutiny. Certain of these “truths”—fatuous generalizations about women, obnoxious remarks about the relative abilities of races and classes—fail to impress the modern reader. Weininger’s notion of “ethics,” rooted in Puritanism and self-hatred, is as hypocritical as anyone’s. As in prior periods of cultural and social upheaval, revolutionary gestures betray a reactionary mind-set. Many members of the modernist vanguard would tack away from a fashionable solidarity with social outcasts and toward various forms of ultranationalism, authoritarianism, even Nazism. Moreover, only in a prosperous, liberal, art- infatuated society could such a determinedly antisocial class of artists survive, or find an audience. The bourgeois worship of art had implanted in artists’ minds an attitude of infallibility, according to which the imagination made its own laws. That mentality made possible the extremes of modern art.
Absolutely agree. What Nostradamus might lack in excecution, it certainly makes up for in ambition. Firepower is just playing safe. I know which album I'd prefer.Firepower is the most overrated album ever on MaidenFans. Don't @ me.
Nostradamus slays it.
Dream Theater - Train of Thought (2003) How it got here List entries: Metal Kingdom 26 Maidenfans Nominators: @FTB, @KidInTheDark666, @Lampwick 43, @MrKnickerbocker, @Shmoolikipod, @Spambot | |
League 3 - Match 29 | vs. |
AC/DC - Highway to Hell (1979) How it got here List entries: Metal Rules 18 Maidenfans Nominators: @Niall Kielt Previous Rounds: League 4: Defeated Iron Maiden - Dance of Death 16-15. |
AC/DC - Back in Black (1980) How it got here List entries: Metal Rules 4 Maidenfans Nominators: @Dr Eddie’s Wingman, @Jer, @mckindog, @srfc | |
League 3 - Match 30 | vs. |
Opeth - Still Life (1999) How it got here List entries: Metal Kingdom 97 Maidenfans Nominators: @Collin, @Midnight, @MrKnickerbocker, @Night Prowler, @Shmoolikipod, @The Flash Previous Rounds: League 4: Defeated UFO - Lights Out 16-14. |
Diamond Head - Lightning to the Nations (1980) How it got here List entries: Rolling Stone 42, Metalstorm 45, DigitalDreamDoor 45 Maidenfans Nominators: n/a | |
League 3 - Match 31 | vs. |
Iced Earth - Burnt Offerings (1995) How it got here List entries: Metalstorm 88 Maidenfans Nominators: @Forostar, @Mosh, @Perun Previous Rounds: League 4: Defeated Motörhead - Inferno 20-10. |
Slayer - South of Heaven (1988) How it got here List entries: Rolling Stone 47, Metal Rules 23, DigitalDreamDoor 63 Maidenfans Nominators: n/a | |
League 3 - Match 32 | vs. |
Rush - Hemispheres (1978) How it got here List entries: n/a Maidenfans Nominators: @Midnight Previous Rounds: League 10: Defeated Rush - Permanent Waves 15-11. League 9: Defeated Rosetta - Wake/Lift 19-3. League 8: Defeated The Michael Schenker Group - The Michael Schenker Group 19-8. League 7: Defeated Gojira - Magma 20-5. League 6: Defeated Rush - Clockwork Angels 15-12. League 5: Defeated Celtic Frost - To Mega Therion 17-12. League 4: Defeated Stratovarius - Visions 20-11. |