Coronavirus

Was just notified that everyone age 16+ will be eligible for vaccination in the U.S. state of Minnesota as of tomorrow, which is at least a couple months ahead of the original schedule, and a full month ahead of the new national schedule. Good news — hopefully things will pick up in other parts of the world soon as well.
 
We're getting to milestones early here too. We just hit 70+ today, about two weeks ahead of schedule, and I wonder how much of it is due to hesitancy.
 
Was just notified that everyone age 16+ will be eligible for vaccination in the U.S. state of Minnesota as of tomorrow, which is at least a couple months ahead of the original schedule, and a full month ahead of the new national schedule. Good news — hopefully things will pick up in other parts of the world soon as well.
Same here in Texas starting today ... everyone over 16 can get a shot. My second shot is tomorrow
 
I would like to get vaccinated - currently in Poland, young people have a harder time of Covid and have more complications, and the waiting time for an ambulance is sometimes 12 hours. However, the government still sticks to the strategy of vaccinating the elderly so, as announced by the government, my turn to get vaccinated will be around July / August this year.
Come and get vaccinated in Serbia. You can apply online. Although you'd only get one or two days of notice before the appointment.
 
The UK government is very proud of how many people have now been "offered" a vaccine but I have cause to be concerned about what they think constitutes an "offer". My sister, who is more at risk than me, has been "offered" a vaccine - but only if she can get herself to Lincoln or Scunthorpe. Both are about 20 miles away, she's disabled and she can't drive. Not much of an "offer" then, is it? It does give some context to the caution over the level of non-takeup though.
 
I would like to get vaccinated - currently in Poland, young people have a harder time of Covid and have more complications, and the waiting time for an ambulance is sometimes 12 hours. However, the government still sticks to the strategy of vaccinating the elderly so, as announced by the government, my turn to get vaccinated will be around July / August this year.
In the last Covid peak in Jan/Feb, a local ICU doctor who runs a blog made the point that yes, far fewer older people were in critical care, possibly because they'd had their first dose of vaccine (or else those who'd not already been infected before were being extremely careful) but those becoming seriously ill and dying were 40s, 50s and early 60s, and there were also very sick people in their 20s. The case numbers had been allowed to spiral out of the control, maybe in the belief that now that those considered most at risk had some protection, severe illness wasn't as likely. Covid had other ideas. As soon as the case numbers climbed, the number of hospitalisations, intensive care admissions and deaths kept pace. I'm just hoping they're not about to make the same mistake all over again, telling everyone to pack back into offices, pubs, gyms and coffee shops, and go and party with friends.

Something odd has happened with the reporting of cases in this region in the past few days. For about three days running, the overall local authority case numbers (recorded since March last year) have gone down. Apparently it was due to an awful lot of tests recorded in the past week being reclassified as void rather than positive. I'm not sure if that was because some people with Covid were re-rested, so their positive result was recorded twice, or there was another reason for the positive results being rejected. However, since the daily figures have started up again, they're pretty much reflecting the pattern and the numbers that was showing before - cases are falling right off mostly in rural areas, but are definitely rising in more densely populated areas. It suggests the case numbers based on void positive results weren't totally inaccurate.
 
The UK government is very proud of how many people have now been "offered" a vaccine but I have cause to be concerned about what they think constitutes an "offer". My sister, who is more at risk than me, has been "offered" a vaccine - but only if she can get herself to Lincoln or Scunthorpe. Both are about 20 miles away, she's disabled and she can't drive. Not much of an "offer" then, is it? It does give some context to the caution over the level of non-takeup though.
I've no doubt that headline grabbing and national oneupmanship matters to someone. ::)

It's become a very splintered process, probably because it's split between so many vying subdivisions of the NHS (don't get me started on that one!). The service offered in some areas is very slow, very reliant on cars and the ability to travel, while it's all singing all dancing in others. It even varies between GP practices and commissioning groups, not just by area. After seeing the huge and brilliantly organised mass vaccination centres on the news, Paul wasn't at all happy with the grubby and non covid-compliant portacabin in a car park on a sink estate he was sent to, that was a six miles round trip (walking). I know there can be a big difference between whether you respond to an offer from your own GP practice or respond to a letter from the NHS at regional level.

The regional NHS tends to direct you to one of the big testing centres, and yes, there are drives of 50+miles suggested in some cases. If you can take it up, though, you'll get your first dose very quickly, and be able to pre-book the appointment for your second dose. If you wait for your GP practice to contact you, you'll probably be waiting a lot longer, but might be able to go to your own local surgery...or they might send you over to the far side of town because they've clubbed together with another surgery to do vaccinations. A friend who is over 50 was contacted by the NHS and they offered him a slot in Durham - he lives way up in Northumberland. But then his GP practice fast tracked him locally on the grounds of him having an underlying health condition. A work colleague in Middlesbrough was offered a choice of Scarborough or Leeds because the Middlesbrough and Darlington slots are getting booked up so quickly. He doesn't have a car and all of these centres are out-of-town too.

I don't know what happens to people who 'decline' or fail to book an appointment at a venue they can't get to. I'd like to think their GP practice will follow it up or they have the chance to book in somewhere local at a later date, but I suspect it's not that well thought out.
 
I'm just hoping they're not about to make the same mistake all over again, telling everyone to pack back into offices, pubs, gyms and coffee shops, and go and party with friends.

Boris Johnson said yesterday that he does not want another lockdown. That is a very strong indication that there will be another one, isn't it? Back in early Autumn he was talking about a lockdown being a nuclear deterrent and not going to use it that option, yet we've had 2 since!

Anyway, nothing will stop the blustering and the optimistic messages with hyperbolic language that have nothing to do with reality (I feel sorry for Prof Chris Whitty"). We are free at last!

1617097557202.png
 
I think he's trying the carrot and stick method, given that they're keeping on with the health warning adverts this time. I don't want to have to do this, but if you're going to be naughty boys and girls I bally well will. AKA the hedging bets method.
 
In the last Covid peak in Jan/Feb, a local ICU doctor who runs a blog made the point that yes, far fewer older people were in critical care, possibly because they'd had their first dose of vaccine (or else those who'd not already been infected before were being extremely careful) but those becoming seriously ill and dying were 40s, 50s and early 60s, and there were also very sick people in their 20s.

That is interesting. Did he give any figures? The most recent data I have been able to find put the mean age of those dying from COVID-19 in the UK at 80.7 years (79.4 years for males and 82.4 years for females).

The following heatmap (English data showing the rate of deaths of people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test per 100,000 population by date of death, broken down by 5-year age group. Source: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths?areaType=nation&areaName=England) is quite illustrative. The rolling rate of deaths for under 65s has not been over 10 per 100000 at any point during the pandemic, although it is quite evident that those in the 55-65 age bracket have seen their likelihood of dying from COVID-19 increase during the last wave...

View attachment 1617123613124.png
 
He didn't give figures, he specifically meant in his hospital, not nationally. One of the reasons he thought this might be the case was in part that older people have had the first dose of a vaccine, but he also thought people in older age groups were taking distancing and shielding very seriously this time. He felt that people below the most at risk age groups weren't taking enough care. He's also maintained for quite some time that it's just a toss of the coin as to whether you become seriously ill if you're over 50s. The ICU had a lot of very sick people in their 40s and 50s.
 
I don't know what happens to people who 'decline' or fail to book an appointment at a venue they can't get to. I'd like to think their GP practice will follow it up or they have the chance to book in somewhere local at a later date, but I suspect it's not that well thought out.
What my sister did was to contact her GP practice who told her that if she didn't take up anything before, she would eventually be offered an appointment at the local hospital - which she can get to easily on her mobility scooter. So she's holding on for that. Thing is, this Covid Recovery Group (or whatever they're called) has been saying that people who decline to have the vaccine (I assume excepting the folk who can't have it for some reason) should accept they've chosen to take a risk and shouldn't expect the rest of the world to change their lives to protect them. And I basically agree: if they're only counting people who have actually said no. If they end up also counting people who have not taken up impractical offers for miles away because it's simply not possible for them to get there, then I'm worried. I just hope that by approaching it proactively, my sister has prevented herself from dropping off the radar.
 
I think he's trying the carrot and stick method, given that they're keeping on with the health warning adverts this time. I don't want to have to do this, but if you're going to be naughty boys and girls I bally well will. AKA the hedging bets method.
That was what I found most upsetting about the original lockdown - it came across like "naughty children - go to your rooms". In other words, you're not nobly sacrificing your liberties for the good of all, you're being punished because you deserve to be punished. Truth was Boris and his idiot mate Hancock didn't have any better ideas, so they seized an excuse to make it look like it was our fault and the way it was initially enforced also reinforced this message. No wonder everyone's mental health took a dive ...
 
That was what I found most upsetting about the original lockdown - it came across like "naughty children - go to your rooms". In other words, you're not nobly sacrificing your liberties for the good of all, you're being punished because you deserve to be punished. Truth was Boris and his idiot mate Hancock didn't have any better ideas, so they seized an excuse to make it look like it was our fault and the way it was initially enforced also reinforced this message. No wonder everyone's mental health took a dive ...

They have the perfect excuse to use. Rather than accept that their management of this health crisis has been dreadful and has highlighted their sheer incompetence resulting in tens of thousands of avoidable deaths, they can always blame the public! :mad:
 
Astra only for 60 and older in Germany.
For 55 and older in Canada.

Just the other day I was told I should expect to be vaccinated by June at the current pace and I jokingly suggested "just wait for it, I bet they're gonna stop AstraZeneca again".

Well, what can I say.
 
What my sister did was to contact her GP practice who told her that if she didn't take up anything before, she would eventually be offered an appointment at the local hospital - which she can get to easily on her mobility scooter. So she's holding on for that. Thing is, this Covid Recovery Group (or whatever they're called) has been saying that people who decline to have the vaccine (I assume excepting the folk who can't have it for some reason) should accept they've chosen to take a risk and shouldn't expect the rest of the world to change their lives to protect them. And I basically agree: if they're only counting people who have actually said no. If they end up also counting people who have not taken up impractical offers for miles away because it's simply not possible for them to get there, then I'm worried. I just hope that by approaching it proactively, my sister has prevented herself from dropping off the radar.
Yes, this is exactly what worries me about it. I'm sure there are people who consciously reject any offer of a vaccine, but then those who fall through the net just could be lumped into the 'can't be bothered or doesn't want it' category. The government is utterly obsessed with indoctrinating a 'self-serve' mentality, even extending that where it's totally inappropriate and unethical.
 
Back
Top