The problem, in my opinion, is this guy, and this type of journalism, encourages people to jump to conclusions at the mere possibility of hypocrisy (using lyrics from a 29 year old song). Somehow I doubt this fella would expose a politician of his own political views using drones every day, he would probably even defend it. I am guessing he was against US use of drones until, oh, say 2009....and from then on found ways to excuse it when he saw that it was still going on despite the promised "change". Dickinson-a famous guy AND a famous guy with a pro-business (and possibly non-liberal!) point of view possibly manufacturing drones? He doesn't need much proof at all to run with that....and slander his character as well. How many out there will read this story, accept it as fact, look into it no further, and characterize Bruce exactly as the story does? MANY. Anyway, this could be avoided by thoroughly researching the story before writing it OR stating in the story that it is unconfirmed or that he doesn't know for sure. That would be journalistic integrity, however, something in short supply nowadays.....