DAWSON 1 YEAR ON

Aces High obviously is an atrocity. But comparing 2025/2026 to 2022/2023/2024 the former is the clear winner imo. Or on which of those years have they sounded better? Note, I didn't say "better than 2019", I said "since".

Dude, don't lose time on something so obvious as demonstrating that tempo is measurable. Everyone knows that. Many people also know that tempo can flow if done correctly, and that good drummers, like Nicko on «The Wicker Man», can surf tempo, breathing life into a song —not Simon's case though.
That's the thing though, Nicko used to be better about it, but on TFP he didn't "surf" the tempo, nor was he "breathing life" into the songs. He was all over the place and got multiple songs almost completely derailed.

-----

As for the whole "why settle for fine when we could've had amazing": Yeah, I get it. But unfortunately that's not how Steve and the boys see it. They made their choice and they are evidently happy with it. We can complain as much as we want, but that's not gonna change anything.
 
I'm not, nor will I ever be, satisfied with Dawson's drumming. I was hesitant about continuing without Nicko regardless of who the replacement was, but I've made my peace with it and accept that Maiden (with Dawson) existing as a band beyond 2024 in their twilight years makes me happier than with them quitting.
 
Last edited:
Many of us believe Steve Harris chose Simon Dawson as Iron Maiden's replacement drummer. However, after an extensive genealogical investigation, I've come to a very different conclusion.

In this case, the grey cardinal - the man pulling the strings from behind the velvet curtain - is none other than Paul Bruce Dickinson himself.

Simon and Bruce share suspiciously similar surnames "-son", and that's no mere coincidence. They're clearly descendants of the same ancestral bloodline.

Therefore, those unhappy with Simon's appointment must, from this day forward, blame Bruce, this son of a... genealogy. Not Steve. In fact, the evidence even suggests Simon may have been imposed on Steve in his solo band as well, although that particular branch of the investigation remains inconclusive.

For now, I shall return to my deeply secret, highly dangerous, and utterly fascinating research.

Should I never report my findings again, assume I've been silenced by some hired Greek...

P.S. I must also point out another astonishing discovery. Bruce Dickinson and Paul Di'Anno share the same first name. This establishes an undeniable interpersonal connection between them.

The inevitable conclusion is that Steve never fired Paul Di'Anno at all. Paul orchestrated the entire affair himself so that Paul Dickinson could step into the role of Iron Maiden's vocalist.

A staggeringly complicated case, I must admit - but the evidence speaks for itself.

Steve, of course, must never learn the truth. He's afraid of the dark, which makes him remarkably easy to control through Rod and Bruce's sinister influence.

That's all for now. I've already become far too talkative and spilled far too many beans.

Until next time, my fellow Ignorants.
 
As for the whole "why settle for fine when we could've had amazing": Yeah, I get it. But unfortunately that's not how Steve and the boys see it. They made their choice and they are evidently happy with it. We can complain as much as we want, but that's not gonna change anything.

Let's not discuss anything ever then.
 
Back
Top