USA Politics

LooseCannon said:
You know, I simply don't believe that, because while the benefits for partnership have been good for them, it's been great for a lot of countries. The Marshall Plan helped the USA grow, but it also helped France and Italy and West Germany. The reconstruction of Japan led to the country having some of the highest education, health, and happiness rates, etc.
Click to expand...
In return the U.S has a prescence in Europe to keep an eye on Russia.... it's NOT out of the goodness of their heart only because it happens to benefit someone else too.


Jer said:
. We also have special shared national security concerns (e.g. NORAD) that are unique to our countries.
Click to expand...

And there it is....
 
Onhell said:
In return the U.S has a prescence in Europe to keep an eye on Russia.... it's NOT out of the goodness of their heart only because it happens to benefit someone else too.
Click to expand...
I never said it was only that way. But the policy was to create a rising tide, and lift all boats. To build great cities and great economies together. Now it's just...dollars and cents. It's changed.
 
LooseCannon said:
I never said it was only that way. But the policy was to create a rising tide, and lift all boats. To build great cities and great economies together. Now it's just...dollars and cents. It's changed.
Click to expand...
I can agree with that in theory, not in practice, but we do agree that it's definitely changed.
 
Perun said:
Is it too early for this?
Click to expand...

It is too early, give it a year, Biden's first 100 days were not bad at all. Trump started very dynamic but also a bit confused and not well informed, as usually he looks like a work in progress. We'll start get a feel in 100 days and in a year from now we can assess.
For now, there is no visibility where things will actually go. There are some extremely negative signs such as Riviera of the Middle East, but also some very positive such as where regime-changing industrial complex USAID /NED is seemingly going. Regarding Ukraine it can go either direction but I see as very positive that at least they recognise that they should have some kind of dialogue with Russians or other adversaries.
Rubio's comments about the end of US unipolarity are very promising too, I never thought a "neocon" would say something similar let alone the Secretary of State.
About Canada -Mexico let's see what will happen in the end, it's obviously a bizarre and unnecessary thing to punish Canada. I have some doubts if the tariffs will be applied in the end.

To be frank I didn't expect anything good for Gaza either way, just Trump is blunt as fuck where conventional politicians are careful with optics yet the results are similar.

We need to wait and see.

PS
I think it's delusional to believe that America or any other Empire in the history, for that matter, had friends.
Kissinger has famously said "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests" and "it may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal"
If America helped other countries it was for their own interest and it paid exponentially with the dominance of dollar and the consequences that it had to their Imperial dominance.
 
USAID will not be dismantled, just being under Secretary of State will be more transparent. Which is a huge win for future regime changing operations, that will be likely less. Politico was taking millions from USAID. What this has to do with starving children? And China is way more respectful when helping others, no lecture and certainly no regime changing attempts. Or sanctions based on policy. Just being transactional.
 
If it was only on Musk, I have no doubt he'd close it. But it isn't.

-----
@Mosh since you enjoy laughing, let me remind you other times that you laughed, with special attention to dates /timing of my posts -your laugh.

This is precious. Four dates later the debate happened and in a month Biden was gone. Thanks for that, Mosh!


Screenshot 2025-02-08 at 15.20.48.png

Screenshot 2025-02-08 at 15.21.26.png
 
____no5 said:
It is too early, give it a year, Biden's first 100 days were not bad at all. Trump started very dynamic but also a bit confused and not well informed, as usually he looks like a work in progress. We'll start get a feel in 100 days and in a year from now we can assess.
Click to expand...

Aww. Okay then, 20th January 2026, if we can still post then, deal?
 
____no5 said:
If it was only on Musk, I have no doubt he'd close it. But it isn't.

-----
@Mosh since you enjoy laughing, let me remind you other times that you laughed, with special attention to dates /timing of my posts -your laugh.

This is precious. Four dates later the debate happened and in a month Biden was gone. Thanks for that, Mosh!


View attachment 40973

View attachment 40974
Click to expand...
I’m not sure this is the gotcha you think it is. The idea that there was a secret movement within the party to bring down Biden was laughable then and honestly more laughable now considering the amount of weeks and public pressure it took for Biden to step down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top