Shadow said:From Fear to Eternity.
What's that supposed to mean anyway?
seely said:Whilst I think it's a little unfair to leave Blaze out and just use the Bruce-fronted live versions..it isn't entirely unexpected or inconsistent, they did the same with Paul Di'anno's stuff on the SBIT album....think i'll be geting this for completion purposes, nothing more
Mega said:People want Bruce, what can I say.
Paul was on vocals in albums that are considered classics, as opposed to Blaze. Unfourtunatly, most casual Maiden fans seem to really hate Blaze, so not including Blaze in the mix is, at least marketing wise, a good move.
Not that I think that Maiden need, or go after the money here. It's just fan service.
Jeffmetal said:The basis for the set list of next year's celebratory tour is there, folks (funny it doesn't have Wasting Love). Funny is that about 2 years ago, I authored a DVD with things from No Prayer On The Road up to AMOLAD and named it From 90's To Eternity. Basically the same as this compilation.
No. What people are forgetting here is that this is aimed at new fans. Not us. New/casual fans are going to want songs with Bruce on them.Forostar said:Well, the selected Blaze era songs could also be seen as classics, definitely when we focus on the 1990-2010 era.
Ranko said:Sounds like you've got a pretty lucrative lawsuit on your hands!
Great post. Have a praise.snake plissken said:Hmmm just read through this thread. Some good posts, others that make my fucking blood boil. Maiden not having Blaze on here is absolutely the right thing to do. With Blaze as the front man the bands popularity and credibility plummeted. This is a fact! Bruce came back with Adrian and so the all the credibility and popularity. If this is indeed a release for "new" fans who only got into Maiden recently then why the fuck should they put Blaze on it? The 90's are covered and covered very well by Bruce. Fair play to the management for not pandering to the X Fanboy(s) Bruce is where it's at!
Well they do present that history. With Bruce on vocals. I agree with you but the point is to introduce new fans to Maiden. (this album should be a companion to SBIT) Not to please the real fans who enjoy those Blaze albums. And I think it is safe to say that Sign Of The Cross from Rio slaughters the studio version for many reasons. As far as the other ones, I couldn't say cos I haven't heard them.LooseCannon said:For a band that talks about its history a lot, they should respect theirs. I'm a comparatively new fan - post Blaze, been here since BNW - and I think it's terribly disrespectful. It pisses all over 2 albums, one of which is one of their best. Going to confuse a bunch of people who go buy TXF and come away not understanding what the album IS.
LooseCannon said:For a band that talks about its history a lot, they should respect theirs. I'm a comparatively new fan - post Blaze, been here since BNW - and I think it's terribly disrespectful. It pisses all over 2 albums, one of which is one of their best. Going to confuse a bunch of people who go buy TXF and come away not understanding what the album IS.
Hey, at least Maiden plays Blaze songs... Unlike Priest who refuses to play Ripper material. Now there's a band pissing on its history.LooseCannon said:For a band that talks about its history a lot, they should respect theirs. I'm a comparatively new fan - post Blaze, been here since BNW - and I think it's terribly disrespectful. It pisses all over 2 albums, one of which is one of their best. Going to confuse a bunch of people who go buy TXF and come away not understanding what the album IS.