Black Wizard
Pleb Hunter
Countries beginning with Sw...I see a pattern here.
Swabia was a bit more aggressive though.Yeah, I think Swaziland had a rather passive role as well.
I have not seen this show. I really wish we would put the big public film making groups of the UK, USA, and Canada together and make something that really covers the gambit.
At the end of the Pacific Theater of World War II, the Imperial Japanese government accepted the terms of the Potsdam Declaration. In 1945, the unconditional surrender of the Empire of Japan was formally confirmed aboard the Allied battleship, USS Missouri (BB-63). Once the formal documents were signed, General Douglas MacArthur, representing the Allies, was named the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers in Japan.[1]
Emperor Hirohito let it be known to General MacArthur that he was prepared to apologize formally to General MacArthur for Japan's actions during World War II—including an apology for the December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor.[2]
Apology rebuffed[edit]
In one version of the formal apology, Emperor Hirohito, the Japanese monarch, is reported to have said to General MacArthur: "I come before you to offer myself to the judgment of the powers you represent, as one to bear sole responsibility for every political and military decision made and action taken by my people in the conduct of the war."[3]
In a second version of the formal apology, Patrick Lennox Tierney, claims that he was an eye-witness when the Emperor came to the Allied Supreme Commander's headquarters to present this apology. Tierney was in his office on the fifth floor of the Dai-Ichi Insurance Building in Tokyo. This was the same floor where MacArthur's suite was situated.[2] Tierney reported that when the emperor arrived, MacArthur refused to admit him or acknowledge him, and the pivotal moment passed.
Many years later, Tierney made an effort to explain his understanding of the significance of what he claimed he had personally witnessed: "Apology is a very important thing in Japan. [...] It was the rudest, crudest, most uncalled for thing I have ever witnessed in my life."[2] Issues which might have been addressed were allowed to remain open, and unanticipated consequences have unfolded across the decades since then.[4][5]
He had just seen his successor in the Philippines. General wainwright for the first time. Saw how he looked and learned the fate of the soldiers that were under his command. So yeah .... he was pissed and rightfully so.WWII experts, I have a question. To preface, something I found on Wikipedia:
So here's my question: I've heard MacArthur was similarly rude to the Japanese at the surrender on the Missouri. What was his problem?
There was no way to know that the Japanese meant they were sorry. To be honest, we still had no idea exactly how extreme their war crimes were. There's a huge difference between being sorry because you lost and sorry because you want to change. We found that out after 1919.It sounds to me like MacArthur exercised his grudge on the Japanese in a bad way, and I was hoping there was a better reason than personal anger.
Perhaps he did not believe the sincerity of the apology at the time.
There's a huge difference between being sorry because you lost and sorry because you want to change.
part of a growing debate in modern Germany that pits commercialism against Vergangenheitsbewältigung — or the German word for how the country should come to terms with its dark past
After the preservation of so many former Nazi buildings, some also are arguing that enough is enough, saying the time has come to let them waste away or, in some instances, consider tearing them down.
This I sort of understand, but I don't think it's very practical. Why let the site waste away? Why not use it? Doesn't sound right to treat it like a toxic waste dump just because Nazis built it. Doesn't Hitler also get credit for the Autobahn? I don't hear any Germans complaining about driving on that. If Hitler picked out a nice resort site, why throw out a good idea just because it came from a bad man?