I can't see Bernie beating anyone. The communist slur would be enough to keep middle-aged whites home in places he'd need them - the Rust Belt. More millenials would have shown up in places like Boston and New York and San Francisco. Big whoop.
I agreed. I don't see anything being described here as being particularly unique to the USA. And I can't really see how any of it justifies voting for a man who says what Trump has said & who behaves as Trump behaves. I guess the vote was difficult. I don't think I'd have voted for either candidate had I been a voting.Those sentiments among the working class are the same everywhere.
I agreed. I don't see anything being described here as being particularly unique to the USA. And I can't really see how any of it justifies voting for a man who says what Trump has said & who behaves as Trump behaves. I guess the vote was difficult. I don't think I'd have voted for either candidate had I been a voting.
Still, she got more votes.
Did you ever get an answer to any of the stuff you wrote to him?I'm going to be writing my MP to ask if we will be considering American gay couples who lose marriage status as potential refugees for loss of rights, which is one of the reasons we accept refugees, in case Obergfell is overturned.
I agreed. I don't see anything being described here as being particularly unique to the USA. And I can't really see how any of it justifies voting for a man who says what Trump has said & who behaves as Trump behaves. I guess the vote was difficult. I don't think I'd have voted for either candidate had I been a voting.
Correct, I don't think it's surprising. There's no particular need for this person to peddle hate though.But don't you think that given a particularly downtrodden and traditionalist section of the population - especially one that has certain expectations or sense of entitlement - plus a soundbite-heavy politician with a charismatic leadership style, who seems to genuinely be listening to that downtrodden section of the population, mobilising them, and offering immediate action, that it's not too surprising?
It doesn't really matter to me personally (if someone is a declared fascist), as long as it's clearly understood what a particular person really thinks; voter or politician. Honestly, take someone like Farage. Farage is allowed on Question Time (as he should be) & given plenty of air time (debates with other leaders, etc). But when he came to Scotland he was confronted by withering criticism & public protest; against his unapologetic xenophobic rhetoric amongst other things. He just went home. Since I personally agree with this criticism, I think this non-violent response was totally fine. His views are not acceptable in a modern multicultural society. No need to gag him, he's entitled to speak; just don't expect to be made very welcome. Trump's basically the same, in my view. He can say these things, and think these things if he wants. But I find it staggering that people can look past these views/ideas he clearly has (as people obviously disagree with him, but voted for him); or, and this is far worse, actually share them. Again, people can hold these views if they want; it's going to be a pretty poor world to live in if we choose to live by them though...I don't think it's justifiable voting for someone who has distinctly fascist-looking intentions.
Again, Farage. The jolly, beer-drinking, harmless, "little-Englander", blah blah...But given the right person with the right image for any particular population, it could happen anywhere.
Indeed. Nothing worse than hypocrisy.I have to raise an eyebrow at the reactions to Trump of people outside America who have distinctly similar views, but consider him and his supporters a bunch of crazies. Because Trump is foreign, so he's completely different.