Hard to pick... TD seems to be more elaborate, but I think I enjoy listening to JBMG more, so I'm voting for it. I also think that both of them should have already been eliminated, because they are nothing exceptional.

Full of absurdities, that goes far.Yeah, certain pairings turned out to cause some unfair eliminations and advancements. I feel that the final ranking will be full of absurdities but unfortunately it's unavoidable in this game.
That was nothing against you, I realise there is no ideal way of doing this kind of tournament. Different pairings would give us many different rankings, right? So it's always a bit unfair in that case and there's always an element of bias if you pair by hand. To get more accurate results we would have to pit each solo against every other and work with that gigantic amount of data... or something.Full of absurdities, that goes far.
There are no unfair eliminations. And I assure you that I tried to keep the number of "unfair" pairings to a minimum.
No not necessarily. Definitely not many at least. In the beginning I made sure that solos would have more than one chance to get through. Then, I've worked largely with a tournament scheme e.g. a la Wimbledon. I've kicked out a biased voter. If I made one mistake then it was being too late with doing that (so yeah, there could have been some unfair eliminations vs Dave's or Janick's solos; I've heard no one complain about that). I've carefully spread the strongest solos (made sure they would not meet too early, as in seeds). So no. Nothing unfair about anything. Not an inch more than in other regular games. On the contrary, even.Different pairings would give us many different rankings, right?
No, not necessarily every time. Yes, if a pair consists of two different solos, of course. But a solo could still win or loose (again) if it were paired against another opponent.different results every time a pair was to be formed from different solos.


incredible, interesting, and timed so perfectly (especially over that riffing).