I wonder how many people were found innocent.
Wasted155 said:If you want my humble opinion, I think it is the cost of replacing all the signs on the highways and interstates. Seriously, I can see all the Fed, State and Local gov'ts just thinking the cost of replacing the "Hamilton 20" signs to be more than they are willing to fork out for. And, if you don't change them all at the same time, you'll have some in KM and some in MI, which will really fuck up most of the very simple people.
LooseCannon said:Wouldn't it be a lovely make-work project for the new administration? Putting up road signs and paying people to do that, and you could have all the road signs metal forged in Pittsburgh and have them assembled in Ohio, and ship them around the US in trucks made in Detroit.
That's a noble thought, but the more you look into the problem of homelessness, most of them are mentally ill, and some are, sad to say, just lazy bums who make more money begging than with a "decent" job.D&N said:I had an idea about employing homeless people to pick up litter once. You know, it helps them out and gets the streets clean. I guess that makes too much sense though.
NigelTufnel said:There was some entrepreneur who put advertisements on homeless people.
And some just get caught in a rut. Getting them out of this is sometimes, for them, a step in the right direction.Onhell said:That's a noble thought, but the more you look into the problem of homelessness, most of them are mentally ill, and some are, sad to say, just lazy bums who make more money begging than with a "decent" job.
Onhell said:I remember that, he got in trouble didn't he? for "using" people?