TheNew#2
Invader
Final score: 99 (USA) - 94 (Lit)
Annoyed I missed this...
Moving on, Ennis has this in the bag I reckon..
Final score: 99 (USA) - 94 (Lit)
I assume we are only replacing the species and keeping the genus so classifying Phelps as Homo Fish? Better not tell Kanye West... anyone? anyone?he's a fish, not a sapiens sapiens.
(I must add that I was actually happy to see the UK football team lose on penalties to South Korea as I object to Olympic football on principle and I was against the inclusion of a UK football team).
You're absolutely right Crimson Idol. The Olympics are meant to be the pinnacle of sport but for football and tennis that is not the case. If the UK football team had won a medal then I wouldn't have looked at that as being the highlight of Ryan Giggs' career, that would be winning the treble with Manchester United. David Beckham won the treble too plus titles with Real Madrid. Nobody cares about an under-23 tournament that pales in comparison to the events on the track in the main stadium and the World Cup. It's more important to me that Dundee United stay in the SPL season after season than it is that a contrived UK team do well in the Olympics. Footballers are highly paid and get their chance to shine week after week, the Olympics are not for them.Agree with the rest of your post as well but thought I'd comment on this particularly. Whilst the majority of sporting events have regular international competitions they are nothing like the scale of World/Euro cups so I agree. Rugby/Tennis are next in line for size imho. I have watched the Hockey and am even on the fence with that.
Wrote out a rather long rant but I can't really put to words why I think some sports are okay and others aren't so.... I also think that whilst Beckham did a lot to get the olympics here, people are too obsessed with him - there were objections that he both didnt play ('its the last chance he'll get' .. that applies to lots of people) and that he didn't light the torch (no, but he drove it on a boat for how far?).
Understand, but I would love to see Seven's in the Olympics - and I understand it is to be introduced in Rio (though I could be wrong). More teams compete at a high level in Sevens than in 15-a-side, so it would be a good competition. And it will all be wrapped up in a weekend. I would hazard a guess that the amount of top quality teams at 7's is almost as much as there are top quality Hockey teams.Hopefully Rugby will never get in, even in Sevens form. There's barely fifteen countries with a team worth mentioning, and three and a quarter of them are us!
You're absolutely right Crimson Idol. The Olympics are meant to be the pinnacle of sport but for football and tennis that is not the case. If the UK football team had won a medal then I wouldn't have looked at that as being the highlight of Ryan Giggs' career, that would be winning the treble with Manchester United. David Beckham won the treble too plus titles with Real Madrid. Nobody cares about an under-23 tournament that pales in comparison to the events on the track in the main stadium and the World Cup. It's more important to me that Dundee United stay in the SPL season after season than it is that a contrived UK team do well in the Olympics. Footballers are highly paid and get their chance to shine week after week, the Olympics are not for them.
Tennis is also a major sport worldwide with four annual events that are the backbone of the sport. Those four Grand Slams are the events that all tennis players want to win, but the Olympic tournaments are just some random bonus every four years. I'm happy for Andy and Laura that they've managed to guarantee themselves silver medals, and I'll be even happier for them if they manage to win. However, I don't think I'll watch their matches because Olympic tennis just doesn't feel right. It's not the same spectacle as the real Wimbledon Championships.
Basketball is another sport I am uneasy about. The American "Dream Team" are highly paid in the NBA, which is the pinnacle of Basketball, and are just so far ahead of other countries that the Gold medal is a forgone conclusion before the tournament starts. I suppose that the basketball tournament does give people who don't often get the chance to see decent quality Basketball the opportunity to see some good matches and also allows rubbish Basketball countries, such as the UK, the chance to get thrashed by the rest of the world. Hockey isn't too bad though. It's not a major sport (although might be in Pakistan) so it gets its chance on the biggest stage and I have actually come to appreciate it as a very difficult and exciting sport.
Don't get me started on fucking Golf's introduction for the 2016 Olympics in Rio!
Other sports (or "sports") which I don't think should be in the Olympics:
Table Tennis
Synchronized Swimming
Equestrian
Volleyball
Handball
Water Polo
BMX
Hopefully Rugby will never get in, even in Sevens form. There's barely fifteen countries with a team worth mentioning, and three and a quarter of them are us!
I see your point, but for the Scots/Welsh/N Irish - they see a united GB team as a break up of the four oldest FA's in the world. It would not happen, but that was their greatest concern. Trivial I know, but I respect their point.I know football politics in the UK is very strange, but it seems to me that such things should be put aside. And given that this very well could be the last summer Olympics where Scotland is part of the UK, it would have been nice to have seen a proper team put on the field for the sport the UK most wants to win. I find it utterly foolish that such hasn't happened. I also find it insulting to the sport.
I'm pretty sure most of the athletes would prefer an Olympic medal to a grand slam victory or a World Cup (football) medal. Lots of money goes on in sports industry, Olympics doesn't have any of that, Olympics is the basic of sports and that's why it's the most important.