Programs like this generally check a percentage of quoted text vs known works. If the percentage is too high then it's considered to be plagiarized.They have that program that checks that stuff but it doesn't seem to recognize quoted text... they don't care.
Even if referenced, you mean?Programs like this generally check a percentage of quoted text vs known works. If the percentage is too high then it's considered to be plagiarized.
Yeah, that was my point. 6 month suspension (which is what they want) is too harsh.Sounds a bit harsh to boot someone over a single essay, though. A warning or explanation would be good enough.
That seems odd, I can see using the computer as a first pass, then have a human confirm or denyJust goes to confirm how important it is that common sense is used at both ends of an automatized process. Both in specifying it, programming it, and then later in interpreting the results.
This sounds like someone just saying "computer says CHEAT" without putting any actual thought into the consideration.
Shoot them.
Why? Humans taking a look at things makes it hard. Decisions? Bah!That seems odd, I can see using the computer as a first pass, then have a human confirm or deny
I can understand refusing credit or awarding a bad grade to a paper that overused quotes from other sources. But it's not dishonest if they are sourced properly and not misleadingly cited. Expulsion is a remedy for dishonesty, not merely laziness. Based on the facts described here, what this student did may have been very lazy, but it wasn't dishonest.
My thoughts exactly.
And good night from China (although if I'm not mistaken, it's morning in the US now ... and afternoon in Europe)