Not saying you need to ignore the lyrics. But weird to see this having an as low grade as the other songs from this and previous albums. Do you really find the rest of the music as bad as the other 3's you gave?
This is not better than Love Zone? Even Private Property had a higher grade. What the....
That goes to show how much lyrics affect what I'm listening to. Some of those songs have better music than the
Turbo tracks you mention, but even worse lyrics and terrible production. In general, I'd say that my 10 point scale is divided between points for instrumental quality, lyric quality, performance, and production. So:
1-5 = production, lyrics
6-10 = musical quality, overall strong strength, emotional effectiveness
Thus, songs with a 3 or 4/10 essentially means that I think the music fine to good, but I would have rated the lyrics or production (or both) a 0/10 (which isn't an option). Songs with 6-10/10 generally have good enough lyrics and production to allow the instrumental and overall power of the song to ring through and end with a higher overall rating. Does that make sense? Probably not. Makes sense to me, though!
I find it interesting that so many people dislike “Johnny B. Goode”. I’ve always thought that it was one of the best metal covers out there and was a cool spin on the original. I like it a lot; dunno what people don’t find good about it.
It's interesting, hence my higher rating than the bad originals on
Ram It Down, but I just don't think it works. Metal bands covering blues songs was also a thing in the 80s and almost none of them really work for me beyond the initial oddity value. Priest covering "Johnny B. Goode", Megadeth tried "These Boots" and "I Ain't Superstitious", Armored Saint's cover of "Saturday Night Special", etc.