I see many people pretend to think this Virtual XI is good just because Iron Maiden is their favorite band; stop fooling yourself
When I first got into Iron Maiden, I got in via Napster in 2001. As a result, I grabbed some songs out of order. Some of those songs were ones from VXI - When Two Worlds Collide, Futureal, and Lightning Strikes Twice, in that order. All three of them remain personal favourites to this day, regardless of quality. Do I think it's a good album? No, it's not really. Do I think it's better than what you say? Absolutely.
It's certainly got some failed experimental moments and you can feel the beginnings of the reunion-era prog turn in places, and a lot of the experimentation doesn't work, but this is not an album made by a band with a creative dearth, it's an album made by a band that is at a turning point and doesn't know quite where to go. As a result you get songs that reinforce the "dark and brooding" theme of TXF, you get songs that are long and attempt to be progressive without quite knowing how, and you get a really cracking epic that's stood the test of time, and you get a couple shorter songs that try to grab the energy of traditional Maiden short songs.
I
like The Angel and the Gambler. I think it has really great moments in it. I think the choruses, although never-ending, are catchy. I think it sounds different to a lot of what Steve's written, and I think that's intentional. It's not a song that challenges me heavily as a listener, but I like it. I'm not fooling myself into it, it's not on my list of "must listens". I think it's a 7/10, and unfairly maligned because of the repetition and length.
I
like When Two Worlds Collide. I think if this song had ended up on BNW it would be far more lauded. It's got a cool flow to it, and Blaze sounds as good as ever on the song, with the band not sounding dragged down and in the dirt (like in other songs on the album). I'd put it in 7.5/10 or even 8/10.
I
like Lightning Strikes Twice. I like the energy in the chorus and I like the buildup, and I like the solo a lot. I think of all of the songs on this album that I fell in love with before I immersed fully in the Iron Maiden catalogue, this one has fallen the most, but I'd still call it a 7/10.
I'm not going to defend the last three songs on the album. I think Don't Look to the Eyes of a Stranger is one of the worst Iron Maiden songs, in The Assassin/The Apparition level of bad. It plods, it repeats, it meanders. The Educated Fool...I like a lot of what it does, but I'm not sure it works as well as it was intended to work. And Como Estais Amigos is a nice concept, but again, it doesn't work, though it has a lovely vocal performance.
Do I think it's a lovely, superstar album? No. Do I think it's got value above what people express? Absolutely. And hate-filled angry rants directed at me, and others like me, who seem to think that I am deluding myself because I want to show my love of the band? No.
I show my love of the band by listening to
every album.
Every song. And forming deep, meaningful opinions on each and every one of them that aren't just furious "this is crap, this sucks, Blaze stinks" opinions. I might not always express those opinions, but I have 'em. For every song in this band's library, even the scuzzy b-sides that nobody should care about like Pass the Jam and More Tea Vicar (which, by the way, are nonsense and I'm happy they provided the band some fun to create, but I'm not entirely sure why they passed them along to us, because as a listener, I got very little of value other than knowing the band members seem to have the ability to have fun together). I have opinions that are controversial (no, I think SIT is a very pedestrian album because of a bland vocal performance by Bruce and because the synths make it sound very samey), I have opinions that are downright blasphemous to some people (To Tame a Land is a bad idea and a bad execution that gets dragged over the finish line because it has cool guitars), and I have opinions that march in lockstep with the majority of Iron Maiden fans, but I have 'em for my own reasons that have nothing to do with blind mindless adoration.
In short, please don't suggest that opinions of me, or people like me, are the mindless opinions of lickspittles. They aren't. We have good and cogent reasons to like what we like, and dislike what we don't, and we ask you to respect them.