D
Deleted member 7164
Guest
In my view,
this topic links to purely Iron Maiden content - their words in linked interviews, their decisions in linked news. When someone makes something and mentions Iron Maiden it is not Iron Maiden content. In past when I got notification for this topic I expected a bit of new Iron Maiden content, not some guy's stuff which happens to have an opinion about Iron Maiden.
Frankly all these links would better fit in the rating thread, or somewhere, in that particular album subforum.
Yes we can post only new interviews no matter the low frequency of new postings. This is a structured forum. Not all threads need to be "active".
We already had this discussion in video thread with reposts. When you have a saturated thread and low income of new material such as newly uploaded un-seen stuff on YT, the people active with the thread tend to jump over the notification and presume there's a new video in. When you post here, I guess I'm not the only one that expects something by Iron Maiden and not some arbitrary opinion on one of their albums by some Internet guy. I can count through at least a hundred Iron Maiden related videos daily that get on my YT feed, that I don't watch. Reviews, reactions, rankings, rantings. They don't have value, if you don't care about people's opinion. I don't, it tired me over years on this board. Why should you post some guy's opinion as Iron Maiden news when you have a million more opinions here on the very board. Should we post all the react videos in the videos thread?
Line should be drawn somewhere because a forum format is already tough as-is, for years' worth of video and link archival. It is not hard to open up a new topic and putting these links in. We cannot index properly, we cannot search properly, we cannot automatically deal with dead links, at least a minimal categorization should be enforced. IMHO
Nothing personal Kalata, obviously, you brought a tons of good new stuff. Just a bit of discussion aside.
this topic links to purely Iron Maiden content - their words in linked interviews, their decisions in linked news. When someone makes something and mentions Iron Maiden it is not Iron Maiden content. In past when I got notification for this topic I expected a bit of new Iron Maiden content, not some guy's stuff which happens to have an opinion about Iron Maiden.
Frankly all these links would better fit in the rating thread, or somewhere, in that particular album subforum.
Yes we can post only new interviews no matter the low frequency of new postings. This is a structured forum. Not all threads need to be "active".
We already had this discussion in video thread with reposts. When you have a saturated thread and low income of new material such as newly uploaded un-seen stuff on YT, the people active with the thread tend to jump over the notification and presume there's a new video in. When you post here, I guess I'm not the only one that expects something by Iron Maiden and not some arbitrary opinion on one of their albums by some Internet guy. I can count through at least a hundred Iron Maiden related videos daily that get on my YT feed, that I don't watch. Reviews, reactions, rankings, rantings. They don't have value, if you don't care about people's opinion. I don't, it tired me over years on this board. Why should you post some guy's opinion as Iron Maiden news when you have a million more opinions here on the very board. Should we post all the react videos in the videos thread?
Line should be drawn somewhere because a forum format is already tough as-is, for years' worth of video and link archival. It is not hard to open up a new topic and putting these links in. We cannot index properly, we cannot search properly, we cannot automatically deal with dead links, at least a minimal categorization should be enforced. IMHO
Nothing personal Kalata, obviously, you brought a tons of good new stuff. Just a bit of discussion aside.