Holy Smoke I don't care how topical or non-topical these lyrics are. I just don't think they're very well-written and a poor attempt at satire, and the topic is one I just can't get worked up about. If somebody believes they go to heaven by sending a sleazy guy on TV their money, that's really their problem. I am very personally also not fond of topical references, because they are outdated very soon. Anyone remember who Jimmy Reptile is? I know I had to look it up. And the "satellite circus"... nobody says that anymore. How are the televangelists friend of the president? Which president? What country are you even talking about? I'm sure all this made sense in 1990, but we lost the context. I know it's easy to look it up, but it's like a joke: If you have to explain it, chances are it's not very good. The vocal melodies are also not very good on Bruce. If you listen to the last verse, by the time he sings "one hundred years in jail" it sounds like he's completely out of breath. Okay, it's not about the performance here, but I can't help hear him suffering through the song, and since that's the way the lyrics are written, it falls back on them too.
Speed of Light This sounds just like a bunch of random space and science fiction clichés jumbled together. While it does fit the way the song is written, it just speaks about the shallowness of the whole thing to me. There's nothing original in it, it's just an attempt to emulate the Deep Purple sound - and the words reflect that the song is more about a certain musical vision than at creating something enduring. I'm not sure what kind of story the lyrics are supposed to tell, and if the space/scifi elements are meant to be a metaphor for something else. Maybe they are, but I can't really find anything relatable in it.
Deja-Vu So somebody took the Britannica for Children encyclopaedia, looked up Deja-Vu and made Bruce sing the article. I really don't know what the point of the lyrics are: They just tell us what a deja-vu is, and don't connect on an emotional level. It would have been a much better idea to dive into the "surreal" moment in time and perhaps describe the feelings of a person experiencing a deja-vu... from their own perspective. Arguably, that's what the chorus does, but if it all boils down to saying "feel like I've been here before", then maybe it's not a very rewarding topic to write a song about. This becomes a problem when the song itself does not provide as much musical depth as some others on the album, and would have gained very much from more poetic lyrics. This really drags the song as a whole down. It's very different from Alexander in that respect: While I think the lyrics of the latter are bad, the song itself is so good that the lyrics don't do any harm to it. Here, they need to complement each other much more, but they don't.
Don't Look to the Eyes of a Stranger Meh. This is really a rehash of the lyrical theme from Killers, except that it's now in second person and talking to the victim. This in itself wouldn't be so bad, if it weren't for the fact that it is just a very blunt description of paranoia. It works with the drive of the song, so I would be almost inclined not to vote for it, but a few things unfortunately drag it down. One being that the verses describe a dramatic change that isn't reflected in the songwriting. They are fast, but have the same speed at the time the protagonist walks down the alley to when he starts to run. This is a dramatic development! Change the pace! It cheapens the menacing content of the lyrics, and they don't really fit the song in many ways. It's especially problematic for me because the song has absolutely no problem changing its pace elsewhere. But not where it would emphasise the tension? The build-up from verse section to solos is extremely dramatic and fits the story really well. But do we get the story told here? No, we just get "don't look to, don't look to, don't look to" ad nauseam. It's a really sorely missed opportunity, and it cheapens the verses to the effect that it feels like they were only put in because, you know, a song needs verses. Maybe I could have a more positive opinion on this if the dramatic build-up didn't contain any vocals at all. In that case, the verses could play the role of an introduction, telling you what the story is about but leaving the music to tell you. But even then, I still think they are not that well written, and I'm not a terribly big fan of second-person narratives. It would work as your brain telling you these things if there was more manipulative subtlety in the lyrics, but here it's just very blunt and feels phoned in.
Age of Innocence "And all the politicians and their hollow promises..." Ugh. If Steve was going for telling us a story about a guy who sits in the pub and starts rambling after his third ale, he achieved it. Problem is, he wasn't going for that. He is the guy rambling here. Okay, I get it - he's angry. This is no longer the country he grew up in, blablabla. If you really want to write a song about it, fine. But can you do a bit better than just glue polemic phrases together? Now, I am aware that I might be prejudiced because the lyrical content is too reactionary for me, so I won't even hold the content against the lyrics themselves. I know life in England is fucked up. But the lyrics fail much more on other levels. First of all, the shift from polemic rambling to poetic reflections in the pre-chorus is so abrupt that it's bewildering. There is no transition here that contains any structural logic. It's like a drunkard who angrily rants the one moment and then breaks down and cries the next. Yes, that is how human emotions often work, but again, this isn't what Steve trying to show us from the outside - he is the drunkard in this case. I can't admire this. What's worse is that the music underneath - underneath! - the lyrics is much more flowing and elegiac, and just calls for more poetic lyrics. It becomes such a problem because the words and Bruce dominate the song so much that they stand in the way of admiring the music. And if they do that, the lyrics had better contain some sort of artistic value. Here, they don't. And that ruins the entire song.