Forostar said:
Actually, if you properly read his response rather than trying to appear condescending and superior, you would notice that Sneaky meant that the song is listenable, but poor by IE standards (hence, it is 'ok' to listen to, yet still mediocre). Funnily enough, he is allowed find the song bad while actually liking the singing!
Forostar said:
Is it really the way they changed things or that they changed things? I tend to believe the latter.
How come people can't stand new ideas on this "so called" open minded, intellectual forum?
For God's sake, not this again. You think that because you like the Overture of the Wicked, you're somehow superior to the rest of us in being open-minded. I'm open to new ideas, provided they do not
suck elephant balls. If I don't like Schaffer's raping of the SW trilogy (which, rather than being 'experimental' or 'enticing to new fans', is, let's face it, a cynical marketing move to promote the new album), I'm not going to pussyfoot around it just to appease your 'broad-mindedness'.
As to the new album, I listened to it (with an open mind), and nearly had to turn it off.
1). The numerous interludes and intros are unnecessary. You listen to them once, then skip them on the next time (
a la 'Nightfall In Middle-Earth'). Funnily enough, it's here that the most memorable song-writing is, with various oriental instruments and interesting story-telling.
2). Who the fuck told Schaffer to layer
every single chorus? I'm guessing the effect he was going for was epicness, grandness and a sense of scale. Instead, he's buried Owen's voice so much in bland, overly-saccharine overdubs that the feeling that remains is one of hollowness. To put it thus; imagine a production of, say,
Les Miserables. The production is done in a football stadium; the sets are scaled up, but the sound system is the same as for a standard theatre. As such, the voices are completely buried in the setting.
3). Schaffer's riffing really started to piss me off. Call me closed-minded, but my idea of a good riff is not excessive palm muting to obliterate all melody. Nor is it the ridiculous amount of 'chugging' riffs and stop-start riffing used on this album. I don't listen to other bands that use that kind of tedious rhythm (Epica, Slipknot)...am I being 'close-minded' for that?
4). The solos are good, although not quite up to the standards of the 90's era. But if you think I'm going to listen to a 3 minute song just for 20 seconds of solo...it's like serving up a dinner of stale bread and hardened cheese, with a small dollop of sweet cream on top.
5). Last but not least, Ripper's vocals. In accordance with Forostar's demands that we should be 'open minded', I tried to ignore my qualms about Ripper's vocals as much as possible. There were certain points at which he showed himself to be a well-talented singer, but I find his voice, like Schaffer's riffing, to be bland and hollow.